A Bright Future

Standard


Originally published on Ink 19 on June 6, 2025

A Bright Future
directed by Lucía Garibaldi

Central to the narratives created around the young female protagonists of director Lucía Garibaldi’s first two features are the interplay between the physical and the familial surroundings and their collective effect on each film’s lead. In both features, the fractured state of a particular geography influences the encircling family who in turn bestows its expectations on the psyche of its lead.

The off-season Uruguayan coastal resort that was the setting of Garibaldi’s full-length feature debut, The Sharks (Los tiburones), which earned Garibaldi a Best Director award at the 2019 Sundance Film Festival in the World Cinema Dramatic competition, provides little hope for the teenage Rosina, who begins the film by drawing her family’s ire after she damages her sister’s eye during a fight. Due to the scorn she faces for her transgression and the lack of anything to do in her dumpy seaside town, which is additionally threatened by a shark sighting that removes the sea as a possible egress and jeopardizes any remaining opportunities from tourism, Rosina takes a job with her father’s small landscaping crew, where she is the only female employee.

Angst-ridden, introverted, and with her burgeoning sexual curiosity surfacing, Rosina fixates on Joselo, an equally awkward co-worker who rejects her advances, leaving Rosina confused, vengeful, and frustrated enough to kidnap his dog, and then eventually enraged enough to use the sharks that imprison her to strike out against him. With clear visual and atmospheric nods to the early films of Lucrecia Martel and a central character who is driven to existentially rebel like Arthur Seaton in Saturday Night, Sunday MorningThe Sharks is a rawly delivered and evocative contemporary metaphor for the search for identity in the face of a grim future where the ways to ascend or escape are scarce.

Amazingly, as pallid and hopeless as the metaphoric seaside landscape was in The Sharks, it is a blissful wonderland compared to the youth-depleted and hyperbolically decrepit town at the center of Lucía Garibaldi’s more narratively and visually ambitious second feature, A Bright Future (Un Futuro Brillante). Cleverly juxtaposed against The Sharks’ Rosina is A Bright Future’s Elisa (Martina Passeggi), a smart, thoughtful, and upright teen who lives with her doting mother in a dilapidated housing complex set in a land where environmental circumstances have left it devoid of canines, who have been replaced by barking speakers, and plagued by an “invasion” of ants. Here, Elisa exists not only as her mother Nélida’s (Soledad Pelayo) constant source of pride, but also as the joy of her neighborhood, as Elisa becomes the final young person selected from there to go to the fabled North, an organized utopia where her older sister and the promising neighboring youths have been sent, never to return. Nélida, unfazed by this sad reality, responds to her eldest daughter’s absence by working two jobs to try to win an auction that would also allow her passage to the North and would fulfill her dream of reuniting her family in the region of progress.

At first, Elisa plays along with her mom’s plan for her, and she attends the circa mid-70s self-help-styled adaptation appointments developed by the comfy-sweatered representatives of the North who are searching for brilliant, emotionally repressed and unexpressive candidates under the guise of genetic and psychological stability. Elisa keeps it together and makes it through the early rounds with flying colors, but when her numerous attempts to contact her sister go unreturned, the rumblings of doubt begin to manifest inside her. Adding to the general disruption of her life is the recently arrived Leonor (Sofía Gala Castiglione), a nurse with a prosthetic leg, a thousand-yard stare, and a film noir vibe of danger, who has moved into Elisa’s building where she has Elisa’s mom and the neighbors buzzing due to her sonic nocturnal carnal omissions that somehow succeed in morally drowning out the noise of the ever-present synthetic animal sounds that are the norm.

With all of this fracturing around her, Elisa turns to the one constant person who never leans heavily on her, her uncle Andrés (Alfonso Tort), who owns and operates a run-down convenience store with his husband/partner and stocks its mostly empty shelves with rare items scavenged during his regular trips to the sequestered and unprotected South. Although it’s a dubious voyage, Elisa tags along, but she is forced to exit before crossing over by the border guards who recognize her as a candidate for the North. This moment provides the representative geographic boundary that was also present via the predator-filled waters of The Sharks. Elisa, now trapped, finds comfort in spending her evenings with her uncle and his partner at their store, and it is in this setting, which inherently symbolizes a passive rebellion, where she and Leonor execute a scheme to raise money to support Elisa’s mother’s journey north, which involves Elisa selling the one valuable asset she possesses: her youth.

As was the case with The Sharks, Garibaldi delivers minimal exposition in A Bright Future as she walks a fine line that risks the potential for audience disengagement in favor of a narrative that is wholly unpredictable. This approach pays off as the film builds towards its final act when the narrative’s unexpected maneuvers fuse with the obtuseness of the dialog and visuals to heighten the emotional fissures opening up in Elisa.

Though more playful in tone and infinitely less dour in plot, Garibaldi’s film neatly melds its world construction and dystopian themes in a way that touches on one of our favorite films from 2021, Chema García Ibarra’s The Sacred Spirit, a film that also ran wild with its fantastical elements to comment on our present-day failures in human connection. Much of the credit here should also go to the film’s cinematographer, Arauco Hernandez, whose tight framing and occasionally awkward viewpoints drive the film deeper into the absurd, and production designer Cecilia Guerriero, who creates a fittingly dilapidated yet feebly forward aesthetic that hearkens to the muted and glaring motifs of failed industrial ambition omnipresent in the Greek Weird Wave.

A Bright Future is a daring second feature for Garibaldi, who, along with co-screenwriter Federico Alvarado, cinematically embraces all the trappings of the brave new world to further explore and expand on the way that society and family profoundly impact young people as they drive them towards a misguided and unsuitable vision of progress.

A Bright Future screens in the Viewpoints section of the Tribeca Film Festival from Thursday, June 5, through Saturday, June 7, 2025.

A Bright Future

Feature photo courtesy of Cinema Tropical

Lily and Generoso Fierro

The Damned

Standard

Originally published on Ink 19 on May 29, 2025

The Damned
directed by Roberto Minervini

The subjects of The Other Side, Roberto Minervini’s 2015 documentary set in northern Louisiana, share a vague understanding of American freedoms. We spend the first half of that emotionally taxing and uncannily prescient portrayal of modern-day America intimately with Mark, a chemically addicted and visibly racist Caucasian male of unknown age who drifts around town unopposed (and enabled) by those around him. Mark makes ends meet by taking an occasional day labor job whenever available and by dealing homemade controlled substances to finance his life with his equally addicted girlfriend Lisa while also providing what he can for multiple generations of his birth family who are barely surviving. Without looking inward for answers, something or someone has put Mark in this situation, and since he doesn’t have a clear enemy — other than the drugs which he recognizes are inescapable in his community — he chooses to vent his anger on then President Obama.

Cut abruptly to the second half of the film, where a group of predominantly Caucasian disenfranchised men, many military veterans themselves, have assembled as an anti-deep state militia and are getting ready to defend an attack on their liberties from a variety of government agencies, which inevitably leads them to target the federal government and Obama once more. With its two disparate stories, The Other Side articulates how the perception of an amorphous threat against the entitled freedom ingrained in our national identity manifests in extreme and misguided actions and beliefs. However, none of our subjects’ daily lives are made better by identifying and rallying against their common enemy, and instead, their overwhelming fear of lost freedom and consequent focus on contemporary political figureheads distract them away from the multitude of historical, economic, and social forces causing their community to be left behind.

Throughout his career directing hybrid-documentaries, Minervini, an Italian by birth who has resided in Southern US communities for decades, has taken his combinatorial objective outsider and adopted insider perspective to examine America’s contemporary identity by focusing on personal stories within our disenfranchised communities to reveal how regional culture, history, and government have shaped the challenges of today. With his newest film, The Damned, his first fiction feature and one that earned him the Best Director prize in the Un Certain Regard section of last year’s Cannes Film Festival, Minervini takes aspects of the desperation inherent in his documentary subjects and their settings and goes back in time to 1862. Set during the early years of the Civil War, The Damned follows a small group of otherwise hapless and mostly indigent Union infantrymen who are mysteriously dispatched to patrol the Northwestern part of the country to protect the land against an undefined foe. Factually, the US Army was sent to that region to secure land during the Gold Rush, and facets of that particular deployment are only hinted at in one scene, leaving the viewer to suppose otherwise. But regardless, as Minervini’s film progresses, the need for historical accuracy erodes away along with any need to adhere to the conventions of the war genre in order to allow The Damned’s philosophical, experiential narrative to flourish.

Soon after the foreshadowing supplied by the film’s opening moments, where we witness a pack of wolves steadily devouring a deer carcass, we are introduced to a group of soldiers of varying ages stationed at their frigid tent-strewn encampment as they wile away their days guarding against attack. The men play cards, drink whisky, take shots at passing wild game, and discuss in a modern vernacular the whys of their enlistment and if/how war aligns with their individual belief systems, be they faith-based, survival-based, or morally-based on the obligation to the anti-slavery cause that was their side of the Civil War. The men eschew all discussions of politics that would further ground them to that moment in time, and we attentively reside in these small moments in the first third of The Damned as we instinctively anticipate the time-tested war movie development of empathetic characters to root for against adversity. Yet, those characters remain purposely underdeveloped as the pall of ever-present danger that consistently looms over these men takes precedence over any single man’s story when we’re thrust head first into a fierce battle where our troops are fired upon from all angles by an intentionally hidden and ubiquitous entity closer to phantoms than any wartime enemy.

For the duration of this ferocious attack, which only lasts minutes (but given its intensity feels endless), Minervini and first-time cinematographer, though longtime collaborator, Carlos Alfonso Corral closely stick to either one or a few of our Union troops at a time as they return rounds while desperately attempting to survive the ordeal that sees many of their number down and the rest in a state of confusion. Once the battle subsides, it is time for the living to gather the dead and continue with their assignments, even though the purpose of their mission, given the unnamed but now very impactful threat, forces our men to question not only their place at this moment, but also the greater meaning of their own existence in a section of a divided country where wilderness still reigns above all else. When the narrative progresses slowly past the days that follow the violence, the conversation shifts as the reality of further assaults, diminishing rations, and the ever-increasing frost and cold creates a wider array of dangers for the troops, who start to exhibit greater levels of vulnerability.

During these moments where the short seconds of silence add a deafening tone, Carlos Alfonso Corral’s camera smartly tightens the frame to examine the winter-worn and increasingly concerned faces of the men as their journeys meander into realms unknown. Onscreen, we see the familiar cinematic image of Union soldiers and the genre specifics of a Civil War epic, yet the mostly improvised, anachronistic dialogue, coupled with the enigmatic idea of evil, suggests a timeless aspect to the crisis depicted: for the echoes of its historical context stretch from the 19th century to the 21st, and the ideas discussed remain at the core of most contemporary conflicts and problems.

As was the case with Minervini’s The Other Side and 2018’s What You Gonna Do When the World’s on Fire?The Damned becomes less of a film about good versus evil and more about the existential crisis that occurs in this nation when faced with an unseen enemy that is taking its physical and psychological toll on us. By cleverly manipulating our expectations for what we have come to expect out of a historical war film, Minervini creates an effective allegory for our current political and social situation where our frustrations with the dysfunctional status quo demand our efforts to assign blame to and attack a physical entity rather than comprehensively addressing the complex institutionalized errors that will most likely never be fully repaired due to the unrelenting waves of perceived threats before us that hijack our attention and demand our immediate, albeit ultimately futile, response.

The Damned screens in Los Angeles at 2220 Arts + Archives on June 13th, 2025 at 8pm with director Roberto Minervini in person. The screening begins the Acropolis Cinema’s multi-evening Minervini retrospective.

The Damned

Photo courtesy of Grasshopper Film

Lily & Generoso Fierro

Best of Film 2024

Standard


Originally published on Ink19 on December 13, 2024

In a year where chaos continued to reign supreme, our favorite films naturally do not have a consistent thread running through them. Instead, there are patterns that convene in our best of film selections that may not logically fit together, but alas, feel like an accurate collage of the ideas, images, sounds, and texts that reverberated in our minds this year.

For the first time, we have four films from Canadian directors that represent three provinces on our list, with each film capturing key essences of its portrayed region. We also have three films that meditate on the concept of the spiritual quest. There are two challenges to the biopic form, two Argentinian re-interpretations of the crime genre, and two works from French cinema stalwarts that cultivate all of their fascinations and their methods into supreme culminations. In addition, there are three documentaries that use repetition in thought-provoking and revelatory ways.

Despite these many differing motifs, there’s one commonality, perhaps obvious, in our selections for 2024 that we should articulate. All of these films are specific: to a geography, to a zeitgeist, to an experience, to a technique. This may seem like a prerequisite for any respectable piece of art, but as the forces of cultural homogenization become more dominant via algorithms every day, never has specificity been more necessary and critical.

As with every year, we’d like to give our appreciation to the outstanding folks behind Acropolis Cinema, AFI Fest, Independent Film Festival Boston, the Brattle Theater, Films at Lincoln Center, the Coolidge Corner Theater, and the Cleveland Cinematheque for their programming and their unwavering efforts to preserve the communal experience and audiovisual wonder of filmgoing. Please support these festivals, microcinemas, and independent theaters in their substantial work.

• •

Việt and Nam / Philippines, France, Singapore, Italy, Germany, Vietnam / dir. Trương Minh Quý

With each of Trương Minh Quý’s films, the director sets forth ideas of the cosmic and the historic along with the multi-layered conceptions of house and home and allows us to watch all of these forces clash and interplay. In his most recent feature, Việt and Nam, Trương’s method has reached its highest form to date, resulting in a hypnotic, moving film made up of various interwoven, open-ended essays on Vietnamese culture and history, all of which are framed by the relationship between the two titular characters. The plot of Việt and Nam is simple albeit particular: Việt and Nam are miners who are best friends and lovers. In the year 2001, Nam is getting ready to leave Vietnam in search of a better future outside of the country, and the film documents the period where Nam looks towards his unknown future and bids his farewell to a present that will soon become the past. As such, history and collective memories weigh heavily on each of Nam’s interactions with his surroundings — his home, his workplace in the mine, and the forest where he attempts to help his mother recover the remains of his father who was killed in the Vietnam War — and his relationships with his mother and Việt, imbuing Việt and Nam with a profoundly elegiac tone. Haunted by the real future incident of the discovery of thirty-nine Vietnamese migrants who were killed in a lorry container that landed in the UK in 2019, Việt and Nam intimates a tragic end to Nam’s departure, but remains fixed throughout on all of the forces that encourage Nam’s migration. Trương offers a multitude of ways that fixations on the past extinguish potential, swelling up Việt and Nam into a mourning cry for the loss of home for all who departed Vietnam’s shores and the loss of opportunities and vibrancy for a country that lost its people. Misinterpreted as a work of slow cinema in the manner of Apichatpong Weerasethakul, Việt and Nam is, in fact, a collage of cinematic techniques ranging from long-takes to cross-cuts, which build the momentum of the film to take us from the bowels of the Earth to its surface and then to a plane above. We had the honor of speaking with Trương Minh Quý in the days before Việt and Nam screened at AFI Fest 2024. You can read that conversation here.

• •

New Dawn Fades (Yeni șafak solarken) / Turkey, Italy / dir. Gürcan Keltek

Symbols and signs have never been more important, and less recognized, than they are today. We are constantly bombarded with visual stimuli as our experiences of reality are mediated by a variety of screens on phones, laptops, televisions, etc. In order to make it through the day without a complete cognitive meltdown, we rarely stop to try to decipher each image and word and deduce what is being signified, and we certainly are remiss in paying such close attention to the objects in our physical reality too. Gürcan Keltek’s superb fiction debut, New Dawn Fades, valiantly takes up the task of revitalizing the significance of sign theory in experience. The film opens in the Hagia Sophia, panning the walls covered in writing and the geometric ceilings of the iconic place of worship, and then narrows its view on Akın (Cem Yiğit Üzümoğlu), our physical and mental guide through Istanbul’s present and unseen past. As we look at Akın in the mosque (and former church), we hear unintelligible, multilayered whispers: the tourists in the background are speaking, but voices from the past or from within Akın are present too. He then returns home to his mother, where we learn that he has recently completed a period of institutionalization. He is clearly still not well, but his mother worsens the situation by relying on medieval beliefs and practices to try to release the malevolent spirits plaguing her son. As such, home is not a place of convalescence and restoration for Akın, and he takes to wandering Istanbul, visiting people and places of varying degrees of significance to him as ancient, Byzantine, Ottoman, and contemporary forces infuse into his perception. Keltek allows us to experience everything as Akın does, and the sound design by Son of Philip acts as a non-verbal representation of Akın’s sign processing, which steadily builds towards a messianic vision (or delusion). Akın’s mental response to the symbols that he encounters may not be fully understandable by those of sound mind, but his ability to detect such signs remind us of how powerful they can be and how our decisions to avoid interpreting them may be paradoxically protective and destructive. We wrote a full review of New Dawn Fades during its festival run this year. That piece is available here.

• •

Tardes de soledad (Afternoons of Solitude) / Spain / dir. Albert Serra

In many of Albert Serra’s films, the frame is the theater stage with a pedestal, and on it is some figure(s) of grand stature, by way of history, notoriousness, and/or national standing, whom the director will strip down and reduce to their most basic form for all of us to examine away from any facades that once entranced us. This Serra method is in full effect in his latest film, Afternoons of Solitude, a documentary which meticulously captures the in-arena trials and tribulations of the world’s leading torero, Andrés Roca Rey. There’s little glory to be had or found in Serra’s rendering of Spain’s controversial, but nevertheless significant national pastime: the director presents close-up studies of multiple corridas without any shot of audience reactions, and though the fights are stitched together by a handful of beyond the arena scenes of transit, undressing, and dressing, the bullfights develop into an increasingly predictable loop, with each fight differentiated merely by the change in costumes by Rey and his cuadrilla and, of course, by the change in the bull opponent. Like a three-act play, a bullfight is structured in thirds, and its script plays out as consistently as that of a passion play. Occasionally, the fight veers off course: a bull attacks and nearly steps on Rey in one and pins him to the arena wall in another, but the script corrects itself each time, with the cuadrilla stepping in to help, Rey returning to the battle full of bravado, and voices exclaiming admiration for Rey’s manhood heard over the images of the torero continuing on until the bull is killed and dragged away by horses, leaving a large streak of blood in the arena sand. Even though we see the arcs of the bullfight over and over again, Serra’s documentation of this national play/shared ritual never becomes tedious thanks to the incredible close-ups and dynamic editing that draws our eyes to the faces and the natural materials and fluids as well as the man-made substances and objects that are essential to a bullfight. The horror of the violence repeatedly enacted towards the bulls in the arena does not go away, but our emotional activation dampens with each fight, replaced by a new lucidity: bullfighting is a tradition that feeds the spectator’s primeval motivations and tendencies at the cost of animal and human life. Afternoons of Solitude dissolves our collective consciousness’s fascination with bullfighting and confronts the culpability of the viewers of the sport. It could become one of the most important records of a long extinct pastime some day in the future — if only we could step away from our deeply rooted attachment to violence.

• •

Comme le feu (Who by Fire) / Canada, France / dir. Philippe Lesage

One of the most energetic reflexive works about filmmaking that we’ve seen in many years, Philippe Lesage’s Who By Fire lures us into a spider web overseen by Blake Cadieux (Arieh Worthalter), a once famous fiction filmmaker who has moved on to become a documentarian and a woodsman (of sorts). Blake invites his former screenwriting partner, Albert Gary (Paul Ahmarani), for a retreat and reunion at his palatial cabin in the woods, and Albert brings along his college-aged children, his daughter, Aliocha (Aurélia Arandi-Longpré), and his son, Max (Antoine Marchand-Gagnon). And Max brings along his best friend, Jeff (Noah Parker), an aspiring filmmaker. When Albert and company arrive to the cabin by a seaplane flown by Blake himself, they meet Blake’s editor, Millie (Sophie Desmarais), his best friend and assistant/wilderness guide, Barney (Carlo Harrietha), and the house chef, Ferran (Guillaume Laurin). At this point, nearly all of the crew members needed to make a film are present, and Blake naturally takes on his role as the director as well as the lead actor in the group’s dynamic even though the cameras aren’t rolling. Blake’s command at the dinner table the first night raises old tensions between him and Albert, and this clash between the former collaborators lets loose an uneasiness that permeates the film. Despite the dominance of Blake as a character, Lesage anchors Who By Fire on Jeff, and as the film progresses, we see the awkward and highly sensitive Jeff get caught between his attraction to Aliocha and his eagerness to impress and learn from Blake, who is quick to share his director’s copy of the screenplay for one of his most famous films with his aspiring disciple. Much to his embarrassment, Jeff gets lost in the woods at night after making a confusing pass at Aliocha and has to be rescued by Blake the next morning. Then, in the late hours of the same day, Jeff catches Blake and Aloicha together as his would-be mentor takes partially clothed photos of his object of desire. Jeff seethes, but he can do little in this space where all activities, including lounging, fishing, dining, or canoeing, are set up and helmed by Blake. As a result, Who By Fire materializes a microcosm where artistic striving crashes into grappling between generations, the older clutching onto what remains of its dominance and the younger trying to ascend while also desperate to glean knowledge and wisdom from its contender. And yet, the film is also an ode to filmmaking: a celebration of the joy, dread, drama, and sadness that the moving image can bring because Blake takes Jeff and all of the people in the cabin through each of these emotions with different situations masterfully constructed and integrated together by Lesage and effortlessly lensed by cinematographer Balthazar Lab. In turn, Who By Fire rejoices the possibilities of cinema as an artform while also sharply articulating the limitations to its progression that people, be it themselves or others, place on it.

• •

L’Été dernier (Last Summer) / France, Norway / dir. Catherine Breillat

There’s something amazing about Last Summer even though its premise around an illicit affair between a stepmother and her stepson is straightforward and its execution doesn’t immediately appear to challenge any conventions of cinema on an initial viewing. But, after some contemplation, what readily becomes apparent about Last Summer is its effortlessness in its unraveling of female desire in an extremely inappropriate relationship, a topic that has dominated the works of Catherine Breillat for decades. With Last Summer, all of Breillat’s daring provocations and examinations of female desire are elegantly channeled into the relationships, self-image construction, and traumas of Anne (Léa Drucker), a prominent attorney who protects abused minors. Anne has a seemingly enviable life: she is well-respected in her career and lives in splendor with a successful and loving businessman husband, Pierre (Olivier Rabourdin), and two adorable adopted Asian daughters on a modest estate protected from the outside world and nearby Paris by lush foliage and beautiful lawns. But, in a moment of intimacy between Anne and Pierre, we see fissures in Anne’s picture perfect existence that hint at a traumatic early sexual experience, and upon the arrival of her stepson, Théo (Samuel Kircher), the fissures begin to rupture, propelled by an entangled mess of Anne’s first sexual encounter, the repression of her sexuality overall due to the AIDS pandemic during her early adult years, a fatalistic desire to demolish the life she’s created for herself, and her attraction to Théo’s beauty, sensuality, and rebellious energy. All of these are heavy forces that compel Anne to continue her relationship with Théo, but Breillat expertly infuses them into glances, conversations, and, of course, sexual acts such that nothing ever feels like an overt proclamation or explanation of motivations. As a result, such nuances extend Anne’s character naturally in a highly unnatural, objectionable situation to the point where our judgment of Anne is overtaken by a lucid understanding of her actions. We all know Anne’s relationship with Théo is wrong, but the reasons for its existence and endurance are fundamentally human and, though complicated, within the realm of reasonable comprehension. Last Summer feels like a film that only a later stage of Catherine Breillat could make: there’s no viscera or physical brutality here, only the psychological tumult brought on by the self and others as well as by societal and familial forces — a kind of violence that permeates our own thoughts and desires even if our consequent actions are radically divergent from Anne’s. We reviewed Last Summer during its US theatrical release. You can read our full piece here.

• •

C’est pas moi (It’s Not Me) / France / dir. Leos Carax

Before we dig into It’s Not Me, we do feel the need to address the “what” of Leos Carax in output and opinion prior to this point in his career…Carax was only 24 in 1984 when his celebrated debut feature, Boy Meets Girl, was released. Universal acclaim for his triumphant follow-up, Mauvais Sang (Bad Blood), exalted him as the next great young voice in French cinema, a title that was virtually stripped away after his third feature Les Amants du Pont-Neuf (The Lovers on the Bridge) went spectacularly over-budget and polarized critics, which led him to respond with Pola X, his fittingly bitter adaptation of Herman Melville’s critically detested novel, Pierre: or, The Ambiguities. After the death of his longtime collaborator, cinematographer Jean-Yves Escoffier in 2003, it would be nine more years before Carax’s Holy Motors would hit theaters, a luxuriously enigmatic masterwork that simultaneously honored and challenged cinematic conventions — a film that also subsequently landed on multiple best of the decade lists, including ours. Now, at 64, with his long desired Sparks musical Annette directed and behind him, Carax has internalised the loss of Jean-Luc Godard and connects JLG’s later compositional filter to his own œuvre and historical and contemporary worldview to compose It’s Not Me, a commissioned short film for The Centre Pompidou, a video essay response to the question posed by them: “Who Are You, Leos Carax?” Visually stunning and enthusiastically chaotic in presentation, Carax pulls together the pieces that vacillate wildly inside his mind, from the films seared into him from his own filmography to Murnau’s Sunrise and Hitchcock’s Vertigo to stark documentary footage of Nazi rallies, dictators galore, and drowned migrant children. Carax connects the stimuli to his psyche and supplies his own over-narration, which at times is as judgemental of others as it is self-effacing, and even occasionally lovely with sequences dedicated to the people closest to him, his daughter and Jean-Yves Escoffier. For those uninitiated to and less appreciative of all things Carax, It’s Not Me, will most likely not have the same kind of impact as other directors’ introspection pieces like Bertrand Tavernier’s My Journey Through French Cinema or Varda by Agnès, as those delightful films strive more for a display of personal influences and experiences than what Carax clearly intended for his short: an admission that he still actively searching history and himself for answers to the whys of the world and the present state and potential future of his beloved medium. Though Carax’s undertaking may seem a bit overwhelming to address in a scant forty minutes, It’s Not Me’s overall power lies less in any answer given, but in its glittering omnibus of ideas that come together as questions. Lastly, we must thank Leos for giving us the most surprising and exhilarating post-credit sequence in film history!

• •

Matt and Mara / Canada / dir. Kazik Radwanski

A comedy of manners about the reunion of two estranged friends who are writers living in a rarefied air, Matt and Mara has the construction of a modern love story but is, in fact, a kinetic exploration of the blurred line between an artist’s life and work. When we first meet the pair, Matt (Matt Johnson) surprises Mara (Deragh Campbell) as she hurries towards the door of her classroom. From her furrowed brow and overall countenance, we can immediately tell she’s uncomfortable with his presence. He tells her he’s back in town and wants to meet with her. In quick response, she lets him know she’ll be in touch via email and proceeds to enter the lecture hall. The film then cuts to the beginning of Mara’s lecture for a poetry class and her shifting attention to Matt tiptoeing into the classroom and clumsily looking for a seat. Mara smiles, and we can sense that these two have known each other incredibly well, despite the tension in their interaction in the opening scene. After Mara’s class, the duo head to a cafe where they talk about the ideas that they are creatively reflecting on: Matt is trying to find proximity to characters in his writing that are far different from himself, and Mara is interested in a protagonist who “truly believes that they know nothing about themselves and that all of their desires are complete secrets from them.” We learn more about the past dynamic between Matt and Mara from conversations Mara has with one of her colleagues as well as with her husband, moments that are interspersed between scenes of Matt and Mara in the present. With Matt back in Toronto after an extended period in New York, the two friends frolic and play around on the city’s sidewalks, get passport photos taken, attend a party at the house of Mara’s department head, and visit Matt’s comatose father in the hospital. The pair are radically different, but together, both have a vibrancy and warmth with each other that is noticeably different from their relationships with others in their respective lives. And yet, Mara’s own uncertainty with herself and Matt’s false extroversion that distracts away from his lack of confidence eventually come to a head when Matt chaperones Mara to a conference, and both writers are forced to assess their relationship with each other as people, not artistic personas. With Matt and Mara, Kazik Radwanski exhibits a refreshingly contemporary understanding of communication, action, and intimacy and where they all break down, making Matt and Mara one of the most sharply resonant and observant films that we saw this year. You can read a full review of Matt and Mara here

• •

Algo viejo, algo nuevo, algo prestado (Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed) / Argentina / dir. Hernán Rosselli

With his hybrid-fiction crime film, Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed, director Hernán Rosselli creates a visually diverse and complex low-budget feature that is as innovative in its inception as it is thoughtful in its construction. Utilizing ideas from his own familial experiences, along with surveillance footage, news reports, and the home videos given to him by his longtime Lomas de Zamora neighbor (and ultimately the star of his film), Maribel Felpeto, Rosselli cleverly composes a fictional narrative on a family’s illegal gambling business that blurs reality in a similar fashion to our own memories through the use of the aforementioned varied media elements. The plot is centered on Maribel, who, along with her mother Alejandra (portrayed by Maribel’s real-life mother, Alejandra Cánepa) and some trusted allies, attempts to carry on the their clandestine bookmaking operation after the sudden suicide of the family’s patriarch, Hugo Felpeto. While attempting to stay two steps ahead of federal officers, who are systematically raiding gambling dens all over the country in defense of the growing national lottery, Maribel is tasked with destroying any documents that could be found incriminating in a raid and breaking into her late father’s laptop to see if he moved any money to secret accounts. This search by Maribel through her father’s online accounts turns up evidence of her father’s extramarital activities, which prompts her to search for answers that, when found, leave her questioning everything from her family’s structure to her own identity and purpose. Operating as the central narrator, Maribel’s thoughts are effectively matched throughout the narrative with the real-life home videos shot by Hugo that primarily serve to paint an affecting portrait of her mother’s transformation from an intelligent, but naive fiancée to the decisive and ruthless leader whom Maribel was raised to emulate. Through the use of surveillance footage that provides emotional distance and also foreshadows the raid that will shutter the family’s business forever, we as the audience become less concerned with a dramatic outcome, leaving us free to examine how our perceptions of reality are formed when we are inundated with a barrage of misleading stories about and by the people we trust throughout our lives. Take a look at our full review of Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed, which was published here on Ink 19 on December 9th.

• •

Universal Language / Canada / dir. Matthew Rankin

When we viewed Matthew Rankin’s debut feature, The Twentieth Century, we were immediately charmed by his idiosyncratic style of overlaying farce on top of a selection of events in Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King’s life. The bizarre but vibrant aesthetic of the film, hearkening to Futurism, German Expressionism, and Surrealism filtered through the Golden Age of Television proclaimed the Winnipeg-born director as a clear descendent of Guy Maddin. This lineage is reaffirmed with Rankin’s second full-length, Universal Language, but the director introduces the influence of an additional parent, Iranian cinema. Universal Language reimagines Winnipeg as the Tehran of Canada, a place where the beige architecture and snow of one of the world’s coldest cities live side by side with the city’s Persian culture and dominant language, Farsi. The film tells two tales and gathers them together with an enthusiastic tour guide who shows people the marvels of Winnipeg. One of the stories pays homage to Jafar Panahi’s White Balloon: two sisters (Rojina Esmaeili and Saba Vahedyousefi) roam the city looking for an ax to excavate money frozen in ice in order to pay for the replacement glasses of one of the sister’s classmates. And, in the other, a man — played by Rankin himself as a nod to the tradition of Iranian directors playing themselves in their own films — leaves Montréal and returns to Winnipeg only to find that his mother’s exact whereabouts are a mystery as his childhood home has been sold and is occupied instead by a kind family. Meanwhile, the tour guide (executive producer and co-writer Pirouz Nemati) emphatically highlights Winnipeg’s modest sights such as its abandoned mall and a forgotten briefcase that no one has ever taken or opened, which has become a city landmark as an emblem for human honesty and trustworthiness. The characters roam around Winnipeg’s streets and sidewalks seeking completely separate things, but, gradually, their paths move closer to each other and lead them to the tour guide’s apartment where revelations transpire. By superimposing Tehran on Winnipeg, Rankin implicitly raises issues around autonomy and independence inherent in the tensions between Canada’s Anglo and French origins while also noting the multiculturalism of Canada that accelerated in the twentieth century. The Winnipeg of Universal Language is as foreign to Montréal as Paris is and vice versa, but both cities are related through their history, particularly by Louis Riel, whose monument is notably featured in the film next to a highway. Born in Saint Boniface (which is now a part of present-day Winnipeg) to a Métis father and French-Canadian mother in 1844 and educated in Montréal, Riel founded the province of Manitoba and fought against the Canadian government’s attempts to take over Métis land in the region. His charge of treason and subsequent execution catalyzed a rise in Québec nationalism in the late 1880s, which, in the century to follow, gave rise to the Québec sovereignty movement. Riel thus embodies Canadian plurality, and the scenes featuring his monument stress this concept that is dear to the film and its filmmaker. Universal Language envisions an entirely Persian Winnipeg, but in doing so, it demonstrates how we, despite our divisions, are inextricably linked in ways seen and unseen, and there’s something lovely and amazing about that.

• •

Inside the Yellow Cocoon Shell (Bên Trong Vỏ Kén Vàng) / Vietnam, Singapore / dir. Phạm Thiên Ân

A sinuous road film flowing with sensorial delights, Inside the Yellow Cocoon Shell takes us from Saigon to the Lâm Đồng province in Vietnam’s Southern Central highlands where the director Phạm and his cinematic analog, Thiên (Lê Phong Vũ), grew up. In the earliest parts of Inside the Yellow Cocoon Shell, we observe Thiên moving listlessly through his life in Saigon: he edits wedding videos in his small apartment; he hangs out with his friends; he gets a massage. Phạm, along with his cinematographer, Đinh Duy Hưng, present these moments in long takes, allowing the audience to see what’s happening around Thiên and how it all fails to inspire any activation from him. When Thiên’s young nephew Đào (Nguyễn Thịnh) manages to survive a motorbike accident that kills his mother, Thiên suddenly becomes Đào’s guardian and takes on the duty of bringing his nephew as well as his sister-in-law’s body back to their shared hometown in the countryside. Once the van that he hires for transport out of Saigon arrives at Lâm Đồng, Thiên is reimmersed in the physical and the spiritual landscape that he had left behind. The service for his sister-in-law is held in the Catholic church that he attended as a child. And, he is surrounded by the lush mountains of the highlands and a constant mist and fog, evoking a mixed sense of the mystical, primordial, and holy. The long takes continue here, but Thiên is noticeably more aware and pensive as figures and moments from his past re-emerge and lead him to embark on a mission to find his brother, Tâm, who departed years ago on a spiritual mission with destination unknown. Thiên rides his motorbike and walks on mountainous roads, and his upward movement physically parallels his ascension of metaphysical planes. Navigating between multiple dualities — reality and dreams, city and country, earthly and divine — to render the complexity and beauty of the spiritual quest, Inside the Yellow Cocoon Shell is a highly accomplished debut feature that remained in our minds throughout 2024. We had the privilege of speaking with Phạm Thiên Ân at the beginning of this year about his Camera d’Or winning film. You can read that conversation here.

• •

SUPPLEMENTAL FILMS

Anora / USA / Sean Baker

It’s too easy to simply reclassify Sean Baker’s Palme d’Or-winning feature Anora as a modern and more realistic reimagining of one of the most inept and insulting Hollywood films ever made, Pretty Woman. Sure, the setup is virtually the same…A streetwise sex worker from the wrong side of the tracks comes to know a wealthy John who pulls her into a world of privilege she never dreamed of, and it all seems grand until the straights complain about the woman of a questionable past, and it becomes a fight to end the affair. But, with its torrid pace, central characters, and, most importantly, the silent growing camaraderie between its central characters who are put into an impossible situation that reflects upon their place in New York City, Baker remarkably manages with Anora to draw an unlikely comparison to one of the finest genre masterworks of 1970s American cinema, Sidney Lumet’s Dog Day Afternoon. Here, the titular Anora (Mikey Madison) is, in her voice and attitude, the pure embodiment of many generations of Brooklyn rolled into one. A descendant of Russian immigrants, Anora lives in a second-story working-class apartment with her sister, where she sleeps during the day and works as an exotic dancer at night at a less-than-opulent men’s club. On one of those nights, she is commanded by the club’s owner to utilize her Russian language skills in order to attend to Vanya (Mark Eydelshteyn), the spastic adult son of absent oligarch parents who have left their boy in the States with just a palatial mansion and an unlimited expense account to keep him entertained while he skips out on college. Always up for a good time, Vanya requests that Anora come to his estate for a paid sexual encounter, which then turns into a party invitation and a request to exclusively escort him for a week, leading to some casual hangs and an airplane ride that lands the pair in Vegas for a quickie wedding.

It’s all starry-eyed for a moment for the newlyweds until they head back to New York, where the beleaguered paid assistants of Vanya’s parents, Toros (Karren Karagulian), Garnick (Vache Tovmasyan), and Igor (Yura Borisov), race to the mansion to send Anora packing. Once at the mansion, though, the goonish trio subdues Anora after a long, drawn-out fight, and Vanya, ever the cowardly brat, runs away, leaving his bride behind. For the remaining two-thirds of Baker’s film, Anora, Toros, Garnick, and Igor frantically race through a frozen NYC on a desperate and, at times, comedic search for Vanya, and it is this grouping of broken individuals, who should be constantly at one another who come to realize that they are all, by their lot in life, stuck in this miserable situation in an unforgiving city, that pulls Anora into the same universe inhabited by Sonny, Sal, the scared tellers, and even the cops of Lumet’s sweltering summer bank heist film gone wrong. In the end, like Dog Day AfternoonAnora ultimately benefits from stunning, unique performances that fuel the well-written characters in each film to wholly depict New York City in their respective eras as a place where anything can happen, but where the majority of its citizens are struggling under the thumb of a power too strong to overcome.

• •

Youth (Spring) / France, Luxembourg, Netherlands / dir. Wang Bing

Carved from 2,600 hours of footage, Wang Bing’s Youth (Spring) exhaustively considers the cyclical nature of the terms of its title as expressed by the everyday moments of teenagers and young adults working in small factories in Zhili City, approximately 150 kilometers away from Shanghai. For each year’s garment making season, which begins in colder months and ends sometime in spring, the young from rural provinces travel to Zhili City to make children’s clothing. Each factory produces a set of styles determined by the managers and owners, and payment for each laborer is based on a pattern’s complexity and the total number of pieces sewn by the end of the season. The work is undoubtedly grueling, but the workers manage to find life and do the things that newly emerging adults do: bicker and fight, fall in and out of love, play video games, scroll on phones, hang out with their friends and colleagues, and find creative ways to bear each day of labor. The vivacity and wide-eyedness of the workers is not far from the spirit and energy of their university-bound peers, but Wang reminds us with small details — such as the decaying walls of the dormitories that house our laboring youth and the various social rituals performed around fetching water from industrial spigots to wash each night because the buildings are not equipped with showers — and the constant reiteration of miniature pants, dresses, jackets, and shirts being sewn and stacked, along with extended scenes of negotiation for better payment prices per style, that the factory setting is not a place of mind expansion and development: it is a vicious cycle where youth is commodified and cannibalized, leaving little promise of a different future for the children who will wear the clothes being manufactured. Much has been made about the over three hour runtime of Youth (Spring), but all of that time is needed because the minutiae and the high, low, and in-between moments from the workers’ lives show us how youth disappears not in a single grand event, but rather day-by-day, which is a heartbreaking tragedy that no one can stop, but one that we should avoid accelerating as much as possible.

• •

Los delincuentes (The Delinquents) / Argentina / dir. Rodrigo Moreno

There are two outstanding original Argentine crime films on our list this year: Hernán Rosselli’s harrowing hybrid-fiction essay that challenges our perception of family and identity and its comedic and ethereal counterpart from Rodrigo Moreno that reimagines the bank heist genre into a masterfully entertaining statement on the duality of man. The Delinquents begins with longtime bank employee Morán (Daniel Elías), a paunchy and balding middle-aged man whose visual appearance could easily meld into the corduroy couch of a 70s sitcom, getting ready for his work. One day, with the ease of a master criminal, Morán absconds from his place of employment with a few hundred thousand dollars in a satchel. Later that evening, he meets up with and blackmails his coworker Román (Esteban Bigliardi) to become a post-crime accomplice. The deal: Morán promises to confess to the theft after he returns from a trip out of town and will cut Román in for half of the money if he hides it for him while he serves a three-year jail sentence — the sum for each share of the loot equaling another twenty-plus years of drudgery in the bank. Unfortunately for Román, if he turns this opportunity down, Morán will name him as an accessory, leaving Román with no choice but to nervously stash the plunder in his flat without telling his adoring girlfriend. From this moment on, Román and Morán’s experiences existentially diverge and converge as Morán’s peacefully planned incarceration is rudely interrupted by his extortion-heavy cell block leader, who is, of course, played by the same actor who portrayed his bank supervisor (Germán de Silva), while Román flees to the countryside to hide the cash, where he meets the luminous pastoral Norma (Margarita Molfino), who unbeknownst to Román has previously shared a tryst with Morán (yes, anagrams delightfully abound here)! For its over three-hour running time that blithely goes by, The Delinquents thoughtfully shares notes of criminal symmetry and absurdity with Jarmusch’s Down By Law and yet still emerges as its own distinctly beguiling epic on greed and contentment, richly played through two characters who are the incomplete sides of the same coin.

• •

Soundtrack to a Coup d’Etat / Belgium, France, Netherlands / dir. Johan Grimonprez

In the same way that jazz musicians come together to create a dazzling, intricate mixture of sound comprised of melody and rhythm, regrettably, so too did the Belgian monarchy, the US government, and a slew of corporations in January of 1961 to conspire to execute their insipid plot to delegitimize and kill the first prime minister of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Patrice Lumumba. As he did with his 2017 feature documentary Blue Orchid, which delved into the global arms trade, Belgian multimedia artist and filmmaker Johan Grimonprez once again turns his camera towards the unsavory underbelly of political maneuvering where lives are traded for profit with Soundtrack to a Coup d’Etat. Drawing from the books My CountryAfrica: Autobiography of the Black PasionariaTo Katanga and Back: A UN Case History, and Congo, Inc., here, Grimonprez expertly fuses everything from spoken word pieces to archival footage of the jazz that was performed by a who’s who of iconic artists who were sent by the US State Department to Africa during the 1950s and 60s under the guise of a goodwill mission that actually functioned as a smokescreen for covert operations to undermine post-colonial governments. Implementing a method to cleverly beguile you into a sense of nostalgic joy early in the narrative, Grimonprez and his team of editors enthrall you with a cascade of mesmerizing sounds and visuals from jazz legends, luring you into a state of bliss before steadily pulling the carpet out from under you when the onerous details substantiated through various forms of hard evidence paint a grotesque and calculated picture of America and Belgium’s joint mission to preserve access to Africa’s vast mineral resources, resources that the US feared were slipping away when many of Africa’s nations began to, one by one, unify, strengthen, and pull away from their colonial oppressors. As Soundtrack to a Coup d’Etat details the actions of an American propaganda machine that sought to turn every message of support for Africa’s first post-colonial nation into one of fear and Communist rhetoric, the film thankfully calls out the few brave western artists who caught wind of the plot to dismantle Lumumba’s government who subsequently boycotted being used in the campaign, and so, as the plot unfolds and these musicians and activists express their disdain, the music responds in kind by moving away from bop and into sounds of protest from the Africa that incorporate the continent’s many original rhythms. Given the ambitious nature of the entire composition of Grimonprez’s film, one may fear that the method might overwhelm the subject at times, but instead, the inevitable death of Lumumba still hits hard as it’s presented here, as an outro for the piece that draws a line towards a present-day Congo where dour campaigns continue by governments who now vie for that nation’s coltan, a mineral required to power today’s electronics.

• •

Yeohaengjaui pilyo (A Traveler’s Needs) South Korea / dir. Hong Sang-soo

Considering the seemingly effortless nature of their previous collaborations, it is a surprise that Isabelle Huppert and Hong Sang-soo have only worked together twice in the last dozen years. As seen in 2012’s In Another Country and 2017’s Claire’s Camera, Hong’s immense adoration for Huppert fills the duo’s latest joint project, A Traveler’s Needs, and his absurdist setups continue to showcase Huppert’s considerable talents as a comedic actress. Huppert portrays Iris, a French woman whose mysterious mission in South Korea leans on a method she recently developed to teach the locals her native tongue in order to pay for a portion of her stay, and although she has doubts about her system’s capacity to facilitate language learning, her eccentric nature allows her to test it on anyone who is open to giving it a try. Iris, whose fanciful manner of speaking hangs perfectly inside of a Hong Sang-soo frame, asks her clients to share their most personal thoughts as part of her quasi-remedial process, and after having lengthy discussions with the student in English, Iris writes a succinct synopsis of the ideas and thoughts that emerge in French and requests that the student recite it repeatedly into a tape machine prior to their next meeting. Hong presents two lessons with two different pupils, and within both sessions happens an unprovoked musical performance executed in a lifeless fashion by the students who identically critique their own poor proficiency and admit the desire to have better skill with the same exact words. Iris includes these musical incidents with her students’ disclosed thoughts in the French sentences she gives them, but each line exists as her own reflection on them and commentary on their lack of self-awareness. Each of these statements composed by Iris thereby act as a vehicle for Hong’s criticism of his own people’s desire to constrain art with precise and rigid execution instead of allowing it to flourish with joy from the act of expression and inspiration from the elemental. To this end, Hong carefully distinguishes Iris’s wardrobe from that of the people around her: others mostly wear neutral shades, but Iris wears a delightful springtime nymph inspired ensemble featuring a bright pink floral dress and grass-green sweater, which blends as easily into a park’s landscape as it does into a green terrace where Iris pauses for a rest, suggesting that she is a representation of the natural flow that needs to be embraced by those around her. Alternately, when the scene shifts from the pastoral to the confines of Iris’s apartment bedroom, where she is serenaded by the piano-playing of her flatmate, a poet named In-guk (Ha Seong-guk), Iris’s attire changes to suitably match the room’s warm tones as she persuades her friend and willing benefactor who is allowing her to stay for free to not over fixate on the notes he needs to play next and instead focus on the present sound. But soon, this thoughtful and gentle moment between two friends is interrupted by In-guk’s mother, whose insecurities and unreasonable desire for safety are directed towards her son as she casts doubt on Iris’s wholesome intentions. This dire moment between In-guk and his mother in the final third of A Traveler’s Needs radically shifts the film away from the whimsical and into an even starker cultural statement by Hong of his own people’s reluctance to relinquish their need for control, which suppresses their capacity to connect with their emotions and, in the long run, hinders any meaningful form of expression. The success of A Traveler’s Needs can be largely attributed to Huppert, who gives Iris several dimensions with a single look and contributes significantly to the most recent chapter in Hong’s post-COVID output, which once more features our director issuing a sobering wake-up call to those asleep in complacency in the face of an uncertain future.

• •

Bai ta zhi guang (The Shadowless Tower) / China / dir. Zhang Lü

For his fourteenth feature, Sino-Korean director Zhang Lü presents a subtle and poignant examination of urban loneliness, memory, and reconciliation with The Shadowless Tower. As the title suggests, the Miaoying Temple, with its looming pagoda erected in the thirteenth century in Beijing’s Xicheng district, is known by locals as the “tower without shadow,” as its architectural design allows the absence of a visible imprint on the ground below from any angle. Serving as the tower’s personified center is Gu Wentong (Xin Baiqing), a middle-aged divorced food critic and father of a young daughter who leads an otherwise stable, but emotionally distant life that will soon be pulled into several different directions. On the occasion of the second anniversary of the passing of his mother, Wentong receives news that his long-estranged father has been keeping tabs on him and his sister via his sister’s husband, Li (Wang Hongwei), who has kept this secret for decades. Wentong, now with his father’s nearby address and phone number in his hand, considers a possible reconnection. Concurrently, he develops a cautious relationship with Ouyang Wenhui (Huang Yao), a pixie-like young photographer who takes pictures of the restaurant food to accompany Wentong’s articles and is drawn to him by a great respect and admiration for his writing. The pair spend ample time together in various locales around the city, and although Wenhui is blissfully youthful and expressive, Wentong remains subdued and polite, but when Wenhui admits that she is from Beidaihe, where his father Gu Yunlai (portrayed by the brilliant director of The Blue Kite, Tian Zhuangzhuang) currently resides, he suggests they take a trip there. Once they descend on the beach town, Wentong gently stalks his father while he is out and about, going as far as to tour his apartment when his father is not home, and Wenhui unknowingly befriends Wentong’s father during his regular kite-flying sessions. Wentong tries to better understand his father by looking through the few items in his modest apartment, and when his father returns, Wentong has left, but the father senses his son’s visit and proceeds to leave treats for him, an act of recognition and hope that he will return. These dreamlike and lovely scenes of skewed unspoken reconnections are some of our favorite moments from The Shadowless Tower, and they eventually culminate in an actual reacquaintance between father and son facilitated by Wenhui that sheds light on Yunlai’s absence from Wentong’s life, a reveal that may help Wentong to look inward and reconnect with the world around him. Elegantly lensed by Piao Songri, The Shadowless Tower explores characters in their environment as few films did this year, offering us a skillful and thoughtful commentary on post-COVID urban alienation in modern China.

• •

Louis Riel or Heaven Touches the Earth (Louis Riel or Heaven Touches the Earth ) / Canada, Mexico / dir. Matías Meyer

Few genres in cinema are as hackneyed and overwrought as the biopic. And funny enough, we have two quasi-biopics in our list this year, Quentin Dupieux’s Daaaaaalí! and Matías Meyer’s Louis Riel or Heaven Touches the Earth. While Daaaaaalí! is a parody of the making of a biopic that becomes an essay on the creation of the fantastical artistic and public persona that was Salvador Dalí, Meyer’s foray into the form is a personal reflection on one’s own ethnic, national, and spiritual identity as an outsider channeled through the legendary Canadian figure, Louis Riel, leader of the Métis people and founder of Manitoba. The director, like Louis Riel, speaks English and French fluently, is close in age to Riel during the time period captured in the film (in fact, during production, Meyer was only one year older), is also from a Catholic culture, and has similar spiritual beliefs grounded in the connection between nature and God. At this point, you may have some expectations of a conversational film between Meyer, the director, and Riel, the subject, but let us make it clear that Meyer never directly discusses any of his own experiences in Louis Riel or Heaven Touches the Earth. The director does, however, play the titular character/historical figure and reads Riel’s own diaries and writings throughout the film, Meyer’s first feature directed outside of his home country of Mexico and in Canada instead, where he’s lived since 2011. Louis Riel is one of the most written about and chronicled figures in Canadian history, and consequently, determining which part of Riel’s life to study is a challenge. Meyer selects the period of Riel’s imprisonment prior to his execution for treason and focuses on his messianic visions, reconciliation with the Catholic church, and articulation of the spiritual legacy he’d like to leave for his children and people. The director presents to us a meditative Riel preparing for the end of his life, making Louis Riel or Heaven Touches the Earth less concerned about specific biographical details and more interested in portraying Riel’s state of mind. Hence, the film navigates between Riel’s earthly existence and his heavenly projections, and what makes it particularly commendable is its discipline in tone, which is consistently reflective and never dramatic as Riel’s turmoils in life are quieted by his own thoughts into a place of peace. We had the opportunity to interview Matías Meyer prior to the premiere of the film at FICUNAM 2024. You can read that conversation here.

• •

Daaaaaalí! / France / dir. Quentin Dupieux

It’s been seventeen years since the release of Steak, the directorial debut feature from Quentin Dupieux (a.k.a. Mr. Oizo), and since Steak, we have been treated to a dazzling array of wildly imaginative surrealist comedies that usually find their way into our favorite film list year after year. Of course, as we’ve been admirers of his work, which usually stars a modest cast of exceptionally talented actors, we were beyond stunned early this year when we read that his film, The Second Act (Le Deuxième Acte), featured the A-list talents of Léa Seydoux, Vincent Lindon, and Louis Garrel, and was selected as the opening film at the 2024 Cannes Film Festival! For a director whom we’ve often viewed as an idiosyncratic outsider, we wondered how Dupieux could prepare for that thrush of mainstream attention. Perhaps the most astute way to pre-humble oneself for the glare of the spotlight is to construct a portrait of an artist whose immense popularity in his lifetime helped to foster a media persona that would, at times, outweigh the impact of his work: Salvador Dalí! First premiering at Venice in September of 2023 and released here in the States this fall, Daaaaaalí! is a sublimely narratively scrambled seventy-seven-minute snapshot of the personage of Dalí, which, despite its short running time, could not be portrayed by simply one actor but five: Eduoard Baer, Jonathan Cohen, Pio Marmai, and a couple of Dupieux’s usual suspects: Gilles Lellouche and Alain Chabat. The film’s setup has Judith (played by another of Dupieux’s regulars, Anaïs Demoustier), a pharmacist turned documentarian who has scheduled an interview with Dalí for print, which he hopes/expects/demands as a documentary piece, complete with giant cameras and microphones. Eager for a chance at a big break, Judith agrees to a filmed conversation, which is again aborted by Dalí, who destroys the camera. This is then followed by a third meeting where Dalí insists on interviewing Judith, much to the ire of her short-tempered producer, Jérôme (Romain Duris). Eventually, the overwhelming amount of Dalí’s machinations incorporates Judith, and the film is led down paths-a-plenty that are rapidly reimagined, from desert sojourns to killer cowboys to trips to Hell to Dalí repeatedly imagining himself as an elderly Dalí, all in service of the creation of the Dalí celebrity monolith. Despite its dizzying tangents that purposely fragment in multiple directions, Daaaaaalí! is a disarmingly funny poke at the timeless art of self-mythologization, a practice that is all too common and far less entertaining in our constantly connected and documented lives.

• •

BEST REPERTORY/RESTORATION SCREENING

Coup de Torchon (Clean Slate) / France / dir. Bertrand Tavernier

As devoted fans of Jim Thompson’s novels, there has been a long-running conversation in our home around the sharpest cinematic adaptations of Thompson’s work. Back in 2020, we were treated to the sublime 4K restoration of Série noire, Alain Corneau’s rarely screened take on Thompson’s A Hell of a Woman, and earlier this year we rewatched another of our favorites, James Foley’s 1990 compelling go at Thompson’s After Dark, My Sweet, but inevitably, the debate ends at Coup de Torchon, Tavernier’s radical transformation of Thompson’s Pop. 1280, which rises high above the rest. Cleverly, Tavernier, along with legendary screenwriter Jean Aurenche, extracted Thompson’s bumbling, ineffectual, cuckolded, Southern cop and placed him deep into the misery of 1938 French West Africa to create an occasionally grotesque black comedy that takes dead aim at the inhumanity inherent in colonialism. The wonderful Philippe Noiret commands the film as the philandering, corrupt police chief, Lucien Cordier, who embraces his public role as the town fool only to obfuscate his true self, that of a nihilistic and calculating killer who is more than willing to execute anyone who opposes the moral code that he himself has created. Step by step throughout Coup de Torchon, Cordier becomes the human personification of a colonial government. At first, he appears to carry with him the formal code of justice from his homeland, but as time goes on and the absurdist nature that he and his fellow countrymen represent in this foreign land where the locals have become nothing more than exploited labor, Cordier becomes more hypocritical to his own code of ethics. A last spark of rational hope comes for Cordier in the form of a comely French school teacher, who embodies the good of all that is the homeland’s culture, yet she too becomes another blight for our police chief that makes his colonialist cancer complete with a body count formed out of the mutation. Noiret, who excelled in Tavernier’s L’Horloger de Saint-Paul (The Clockmaker) and La Vie et Rien D’autre (Life and Nothing But), delivers his finest and most emotionally complex performance in a very unsavory role for the ages. The Cleveland Cinematheque screened the new 4K restoration of Coup de Torchon in March, and we thank them immensely for the opportunity to see one of our favorite films of all time restored to new brilliance.

Featured photo courtesy of Epicmedia Productions Inc.

Lily and Generoso Fierro

AFI Fest 2024

Standard
Originally published on Ink19 on November 5, 2024

Los Angeles, California • October 23-27, 2024
by Lily and Generoso Fierro

We are extremely proud to write that this year marks our tenth time covering Los Angeles’s unofficial premiere film festival, AFI Fest!

This year saw one of the largest totals of films programmed at the festival at 158, of which four were World Premieres, six were North American Premieres, and seven were US Premieres! The program represented forty-four countries and boasted nine Best International Feature Oscar® submissions, such as Mati Diop’s hybrid documentary, Dahomey, and Matthew Rankin’s second feature, Universal Language, two of our favorite watches from the impressive slate of films that we were able to catch during the five days of AFI Fest 2024!

In fact, this time around, we took in a total of sixteen features during the festival, and as per usual, our selections drew heavily from the World Cinema, Luminaries, and Discovery sections, but with an added focus this year on the Documentary section, where we caught four features, including the aforementioned Dahomey and Soundtrack to a Coup d’Etat, Johan Grimonprez’s innovative and impactful essay on the events that led to the killing of the first prime minister of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Patrice Lumumba.

As always, we couldn’t make it to everything that we had hoped to see. We’re saddened that the stars didn’t align so that we could attend screenings of the new offerings from Miguel Gomes, Payal Kapadia, and Alain Guiraudie, but we’re extremely glad that we were able to view the latest features from Albert Serra, Hong Sang-soo, and Philippe Lesage, amongst other notable filmmakers we’ve come to appreciate!

Overall, the films that we selected to review below constitute one of the most eclectic mixes of cinema that we have seen over our ten years of coverage of AFI Fest, and for our piece, we have chosen the thirteen movies that we admired the most, beginning with our number one selection from the festival!

• •

Việt and Nam

dir. Trương Minh Quý / Philippines, France, Singapore, Italy, Germany, Vietnam

With each of Trương Minh Quý’s films, the director sets forth ideas of the cosmic and the historic along with the multi-layered conceptions of house and home and allows us to watch all of these forces clash and interplay. In his most recent feature, Việt and Nam, Trương’s method has reached its highest form to date, resulting in a hypnotic, moving film made up of various interwoven, open-ended essays on Vietnamese culture and history, all of which are framed by the relationship between the two titular characters. The plot of Việt and Nam is simple albeit particular: Việt and Nam are miners who are best friends and lovers. In the year 2001, Nam is getting ready to leave Vietnam in search of a better future outside of the country, and the film documents the period where Nam looks towards his unknown future and bids his farewell to a present that will soon become the past. As such, history and collective memories weigh heavily on each of Nam’s interactions with his surroundings — his home, his workplace in the mine, and the forest where he attempts to help his mother recover the remains of his father who was killed in the Vietnam War — and his relationships with his mother and Việt, imbuing Việt and Nam with a profoundly elegiac tone. Haunted by the real future incident of the discovery of thirty-nine Vietnamese migrants who were killed in a lorry container that landed in the UK in 2019, Việt and Nam intimates a tragic end to Nam’s departure, but remains fixed throughout on all of the forces that encourage Nam’s migration. Trương offers a multitude of ways that fixations on the past extinguish potential, swelling up Việt and Nam into a mourning cry for the loss of home for all who departed Vietnam’s shores and the loss of opportunities and vibrancy for a country that lost its people. Misinterpreted as a work of slow cinema in the manner of Apichatpong Weerasethakul, Việt and Nam is, in fact, a collage of cinematic techniques ranging from long-takes to cross-cuts, which build the momentum of the film to take us from the bowels of the Earth to its surface and then to a plane above. We had the honor of speaking with Trương Minh Quý in the days before Việt and Nam screened at AFI Fest 2024. You can read that conversation here.

• •

Tardes de soledad (Afternoons of Solitude)

dir. Albert Serra / Spain

In many of Albert Serra’s films, the frame is the theater stage with a pedestal, and on it is some figure(s) of grand stature, by way of history, notoriousness, and/or national standing, whom the director will strip down and reduce to their most basic form for all of us to examine away from any facades that once entranced us. This Serra method is in full effect in his latest film, Afternoons of Solitude, a documentary which meticulously captures the in-arena trials and tribulations of the world’s leading torero, Andrés Roca Rey. There’s little glory to be had or found in Serra’s rendering of Spain’s controversial, but nevertheless significant national pastime: the director presents close-up studies of multiple corridas without any shot of audience reactions, and though the fights are stitched together by a handful of beyond the arena scenes of transit, undressing, and dressing, the bullfights develop into an increasingly predictable loop, with each fight differentiated merely by the change in costumes by Rey and his cuadrilla and, of course, by the change in the bull opponent. Like a three-act play, a bullfight is structured in thirds, and its script plays out as consistently as that of a passion play. Occasionally, the fight veers off course: a bull attacks and nearly steps on Rey in one and pins him to the arena wall in another, but the script corrects itself each time, with the cuadrilla stepping in to help, Rey returning to the battle full of bravado, and voices exclaiming admiration for Rey’s manhood heard over the images of the torero continuing on until the bull is killed and dragged away by horses, leaving a large streak of blood in the arena sand. Even though we see the arcs of the bullfight over and over again, Serra’s documentation of this national play/shared ritual never becomes tedious thanks to the incredible close-ups and dynamic editing that draws our eyes to the faces and the natural materials and fluids as well as the man-made substances and objects that are essential to a bullfight. The horror of the violence repeatedly enacted towards the bulls in the arena does not go away, but our emotional activation dampens with each fight, replaced by a new lucidity: bullfighting is a tradition that feeds the spectator’s primeval motivations and tendencies at the cost of animal and human life. Afternoons of Solitude dissolves our collective consciousness’s fascination with bullfighting and confronts the culpability of the viewers of the sport. It could become one of the most important records of a long extinct pastime some day in the future — if only we could step away from our deeply rooted attachment to violence.

• •

Comme le feu (Who by Fire)

dir. Philippe Lesage / Canada, France

One of the most energetic reflexive works about filmmaking that we’ve seen in many years, Philippe Lesage’s Who By Fire lures us into a spider web overseen by Blake Cadieux (Arieh Worthalter), a once famous fiction filmmaker who has moved on to become a documentarian and a woodsman (of sorts). Blake invites his former screenwriting partner, Albert Gary (Paul Ahmarani), for a retreat and reunion at his palatial cabin in the woods, and Albert brings along his college-aged children, his daughter, Aliocha (Aurélia Arandi-Longpré), and his son, Max (Antoine Marchand-Gagnon). And Max brings along his best friend, Jeff (Noah Parker), an aspiring filmmaker. When Albert and company arrive to the cabin by a seaplane flown by Blake himself, they meet Blake’s editor, Millie (Sophie Desmarais), his best friend and assistant/wilderness guide, Barney (Carlo Harrietha), and the house chef, Ferran (Guillaume Laurin). At this point, nearly all of the crew members needed to make a film are present, and Blake naturally takes on his role as the director as well as the lead actor in the group’s dynamic even though the cameras aren’t rolling. Blake’s command at the dinner table the first night raises old tensions between him and Albert, and this clash between the former collaborators lets loose an uneasiness that permeates the film. Despite the dominance of Blake as a character, Lesage anchors Who By Fire on Jeff, and as the film progresses, we see the awkward and highly sensitive Jeff get caught between his attraction to Aliocha and his eagerness to impress and learn from Blake, who is quick to share his director’s copy of the screenplay for one of his most famous films with his aspiring disciple. Much to his embarrassment, Jeff gets lost in the woods at night after making a confusing pass at Aliocha and has to be rescued by Blake the next morning. Then, in the late hours of the same day, Jeff catches Blake and Aloicha together as his would-be mentor takes partially clothed photos of his object of desire. Jeff seethes, but he can do little in this space where all activities, including lounging, fishing, dining, or canoeing, are set up and helmed by Blake. As a result, Who By Fire materializes a microcosm where artistic striving crashes into grappling between generations, the older clutching onto what remains of its dominance and the younger trying to ascend while also desperate to glean knowledge and wisdom from its contender. And yet, the film is also an ode to filmmaking: a celebration of the joy, dread, drama, and sadness that the moving image can bring because Blake takes Jeff and all of the people in the cabin through each of these emotions with different situations masterfully constructed and integrated together by Lesage and effortlessly lensed by cinematographer Balthazar Lab. In turn, Who By Fire rejoices the possibilities of cinema as an artform while also sharply articulating the limitations to its progression that people, be it themselves or others, place on it.

• •

Universal Language

dir. Matthew Rankin / Canada

When we viewed Matthew Rankin’s debut feature, The Twentieth Century, we were immediately charmed by his idiosyncratic style of overlaying farce on top of a selection of events in Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King’s life. The bizarre but vibrant aesthetic of the film, hearkening to Futurism, German Expressionism, and Surrealism filtered through the Golden Age of Television proclaimed the Winnipeg-born director as a clear descendent of Guy Maddin. This lineage is reaffirmed with Rankin’s second full-length, Universal Language, but the director introduces the influence of an additional parent, Iranian cinema. Universal Language reimagines Winnipeg as the Tehran of Canada, a place where the beige architecture and snow of one of the world’s coldest cities live side by side with the city’s Persian culture and dominant language, Farsi. The film tells two tales and gathers them together with an enthusiastic tour guide who shows people the marvels of Winnipeg. One of the stories pays homage to Jafar Panahi’s White Balloon: two sisters (Rojina Esmaeili and Saba Vahedyousefi) roam the city looking for an ax to excavate money frozen in ice in order to pay for the replacement glasses of one of the sister’s classmates. And, in the other, a man — played by Rankin himself as a nod to the tradition of Iranian directors playing themselves in their own films — leaves Montréal and returns to Winnipeg only to find that his mother’s exact whereabouts are a mystery as his childhood home has been sold and is occupied instead by a kind family. Meanwhile, the tour guide (executive producer and co-writer Pirouz Nemati) emphatically highlights Winnipeg’s modest sights such as its abandoned mall and a forgotten briefcase that no one has ever taken or opened, which has become a city landmark as an emblem for human honesty and trustworthiness. The characters roam around Winnipeg’s streets and sidewalks seeking completely separate things, but, gradually, their paths move closer to each other and lead them to the tour guide’s apartment where revelations transpire. By superimposing Tehran on Winnipeg, Rankin implicitly raises issues around autonomy and independence inherent in the tensions between Canada’s Anglo and French origins while also noting the multiculturalism of Canada that accelerated in the twentieth century. The Winnipeg of Universal Language is as foreign to Montréal as Paris is and vice versa, but both cities are related through their history, particularly by Louis Riel, whose monument is notably featured in the film next to a highway. Born in Saint Boniface (which is now a part of present-day Winnipeg) to a Métis father and French-Canadian mother in 1844 and educated in Montréal, Riel founded the province of Manitoba and fought against the Canadian government’s attempts to take over Métis land in the region. His charge of treason and subsequent execution catalyzed a rise in Québec nationalism in the late 1880s, which, in the century to follow, gave rise to the Québec sovereignty movement. Riel thus embodies Canadian plurality, and the scenes featuring his monument stress this concept that is dear to the film and its filmmaker. Universal Language envisions an entirely Persian Winnipeg, but in doing so, it demonstrates how we, despite our divisions, are inextricably linked in ways seen and unseen, and there’s something lovely and amazing about that.

• •

Yeohaengjaui pilyo (A Traveler’s Needs)

dir. Hong Sang-soo / South Korea

Considering the seemingly effortless nature of their previous collaborations, it is a surprise that Isabelle Huppert and Hong Sang-soo have only worked together twice in the last dozen years. As seen in 2012’s In Another Country and 2017’s Claire’s Camera, Hong’s immense adoration for Huppert fills the duo’s latest joint project, A Traveler’s Needs, and his absurdist setups continue to showcase Huppert’s considerable talents as a comedic actress. Huppert portrays Iris, a French woman whose mysterious mission in South Korea leans on a method she recently developed to teach the locals her native tongue in order to pay for a portion of her stay, and although she has doubts about her system’s capacity to facilitate language learning, her eccentric nature allows her to test it on anyone who is open to giving it a try. Iris, whose fanciful manner of speaking hangs perfectly inside of a Hong Sang-soo frame, asks her clients to share their most personal thoughts as part of her quasi-remedial process, and after having lengthy discussions with the student in English, Iris writes a succinct synopsis of the ideas and thoughts that emerge in French and requests that the student recite it repeatedly into a tape machine prior to their next meeting. Hong presents two lessons with two different pupils, and within both sessions happens an unprovoked musical performance executed in a lifeless fashion by the students who identically critique their own poor proficiency and admit the desire to have better skill with the same exact words. Iris includes these musical incidents with her students’ disclosed thoughts in the French sentences she gives them, but each line exists as her own reflection on them and commentary on their lack of self-awareness. Each of these statements composed by Iris thereby act as a vehicle for Hong’s criticism of his own people’s desire to constrain art with precise and rigid execution instead of allowing it to flourish with joy from the act of expression and inspiration from the elemental. To this end, Hong carefully distinguishes Iris’s wardrobe from that of the people around her: others mostly wear neutral shades, but Iris wears a delightful springtime nymph inspired ensemble featuring a bright pink floral dress and grass-green sweater, which blends as easily into a park’s landscape as it does into a green terrace where Iris pauses for a rest, suggesting that she is a representation of the natural flow that needs to be embraced by those around her. Alternately, when the scene shifts from the pastoral to the confines of Iris’s apartment bedroom, where she is serenaded by the piano-playing of her flatmate, a poet named In-guk (Ha Seong-guk), Iris’s attire changes to suitably match the room’s warm tones as she persuades her friend and willing benefactor who is allowing her to stay for free to not over fixate on the notes he needs to play next and instead focus on the present sound. But soon, this thoughtful and gentle moment between two friends is interrupted by In-guk’s mother, whose insecurities and unreasonable desire for safety are directed towards her son as she casts doubt on Iris’s wholesome intentions. Ultimately, this dire moment between In-guk and his mother in the final third of A Traveler’s Needs radically shifts the film away from the whimsical and into an even starker cultural statement by Hong of his own people’s reluctance to relinquish their need for control, which suppresses their capacity to connect with their emotions and, in the long run, hinders any meaningful form of expression. The success of A Traveler’s Needs can be largely attributed to Huppert, who gives Iris several dimensions with a single look and contributes significantly to the most recent chapter in Hong’s post-COVID output, which once more features our director issuing a sobering wake-up call to those asleep in complacency in the face of an uncertain future.

• •

Soundtrack to a Coup d’Etat

dir. Johan Grimonprez / Belgium, France, Netherlands

In the same way that jazz musicians come together to create a dazzling, intricate mixture of sound comprised of melody and rhythm, regrettably, so too did the Belgian monarchy, the US government, and a slew of corporations in January of 1961 to conspire to execute their insipid plot to delegitimize and kill the first prime minister of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Patrice Lumumba. As he did with his 2017 feature documentary Blue Orchid, which delved into the global arms trade, Belgian multimedia artist and filmmaker Johan Grimonprez once again turns his camera towards the unsavory underbelly of political maneuvering where lives are traded for profit with Soundtrack to a Coup d’Etat. Drawing from the books My Country, Africa: Autobiography of the Black PasionariaTo Katanga and Back: A UN Case History, and Congo, Inc., here, Grimonprez expertly fuses everything from spoken word pieces to archival footage of the jazz that was performed by a who’s who of iconic artists who were sent by the US State Department to Africa during the 1950s and 60s under the guise of a goodwill mission that actually functioned as a smokescreen for covert operations to undermine post-colonial governments. Implementing a method to cleverly beguile you into a sense of nostalgic joy early in the narrative, Grimonprez and his team of editors enthrall you with a cascade of mesmerizing sounds and visuals from jazz legends, luring you into a state of bliss before steadily pulling the carpet out from under you when the onerous details substantiated through various forms of hard evidence paint a grotesque and calculated picture of America and Belgium’s joint mission to preserve access to Africa’s vast mineral resources, resources that the US feared were slipping away when many of Africa’s nations began to, one by one, unify, strengthen, and pull away from their colonial oppressors. As Soundtrack to a Coup d’Etat details the actions of an American propaganda machine that sought to turn every message of support for Africa’s first post-colonial nation into one of fear and Communist rhetoric, the film thankfully calls out the few brave western artists who caught wind of the plot to dismantle Lumumba’s government who subsequently boycotted being used in the campaign, and so, as the plot unfolds and these musicians and activists express their disdain, the music responds in kind by moving away from bop and into sounds of protest from the Africa that incorporate the continent’s many original rhythms. Given the ambitious nature of the entire composition of Grimonprez’s film, one may fear that the method might overwhelm the subject at times, but instead, the inevitable death of Lumumba still hits hard as it’s presented here, as an outro for the piece that draws a line towards a present-day Congo where dour campaigns continue by governments who now vie for that nation’s coltan, a mineral required to power today’s electronics. Soundtrack to a Coup d’Etat opens nationally in theaters on Friday, November 15th.

• •

Harvest

dir. Athina Rachel Tsangari / UK, US, Germany, France

For Harvest, Athina Rachel Tsangari, one of the pillars of the Greek Weird Wave, deviates away from the odd to tell the story of the beginning of modern Western civilization, right at the precipitating moment marking our transition from an agrarian society to an industrialized one. Set in a village in Scotland loosely around the 1600s, Harvest gives us Walter Thirsk (Caleb Landry Jones) as a guide to the idyllic, fairytale-like expanse of lands owned by the village’s lord, Master Charles Kent (Harry Melling). All of the residents tend to the fields except for Walter, who was Charles’s manservant in childhood and adolescence and, as an adult, has somewhat continued to exist in this same capacity. Consequently, Walter is not treated as a member of the village tribe and exists as a bystander and observer who studies the people in his surroundings as much as the flora along the nearby hills. When Charles’s stable is set ablaze, Walter steps in to rescue his lord’s beloved horse, and although he knows the culprits of the act of arson, he withholds their names, aware of how the others would perceive his identification of the offenders as some of their own. Thankfully, the good-natured Charles dismisses the fire as an accident, but this event quietly ushers in a massive wave of change. Soon after, a woman and two men arrive by canoe and try to camp by the side of the nearby lake, but instead are blamed for the stable fire and are accordingly punished. At the celebration for the end of the growing season, Charles introduces everyone to Phillip Earle, a mapmaker who has arrived to survey the land, and announces a new economic vision for the village: sheep herding for the purposes of the burgeoning wool industry. With the villagers’ paranoia already raised by these recent events, their suspicions and fears escalate further upon the arrival of Edmund Jourdan, Master Kent’s late wife’s cousin and the incarnate of malevolence, who asserts himself as the true owner of the land and the mastermind behind the new vision of sheep. On the request of Charles, Walter assists Phillip Earle, but through all of these changes, which severely impact the villagers and even Charles himself, Walt mostly observes and maintains his distance. As the film proceeds, inaction becomes more despicable, and Harvest reveals itself as a sharply contemporary tale of a non-hero, a man caught between forces that he can’t overcome, one who must piece together some semblance of integrity in a cruel world with few options. Walter isn’t accepted as a member of the peasant class. He’s certainly not a member of the lord class. He’s in the void between, and he must determine if he’s going to participate in Edmund Jordan’s future for him as an administrator of the new business or venture on to new lands and unimagined futures.

• •

Devo

dir. Chris Smith / USA

Before writing this critique of Chris Smith’s deliriously entertaining feature on New Wave pioneers Devo, we seriously considered recusing ourselves from the assignment as we have long revered this innovative outfit that rose up from the Rubber City (also known as Akron, Ohio) to national prominence. Over the years, we’ve seen far too many documentaries on musical artists we admire that fire dead center into the cookie-cutter model of assembling onscreen celebrity talking heads who espouse fanatical adoration and intercutting these lionizations with faded clips from the musician’s heyday, a tiresome approach in direct conflict with the creativity and the vibrancy of the subject artist. Thankfully, for Devo, veteran documentarian Smith (American MovieThe Yes Men) thoughtfully utilizes the abundant library of avant-garde footage created by the band themselves as his documentary’s base and interweaves it with only retro-commercial footage and interviews with the band’s members and outside collaborators, sidestepping all of the antiquated conventions of the rock doc as the director sheds light on the enigmatic political underpinnings of the band’s origins, which began after the protest shootings at Kent State, their mindset behind their early performance art styled live shows, and their subsequent rise through the corporate record industry machine that was the enemy of their self-defined ethos that extolled the ever-evolving de-evolution of man. Though Devo saw fame as a method for getting their social messaging out, the level of how famous the band wanted to become is left intentionally ambiguous by Smith. There are glimpses into the amount of joy that the lucrative record contracts gave the band, but that success was also something that caused Devo endless internal strife. This all may sound a bit serious in tone and warrant comparisons to Todd Haynes’s fittingly austere and highly accomplished doc on the Velvet Underground from 2021, but the editing of Smith’s treatment on what makes Devo who they are comes at you in bright waves, matching the wit and tongue-in-cheek spirit that are fundamental to the band. Smith’s film is funny when he listens to the band’s early forays into creating an image, dour during moments when founding members Gerald Casale and Mark Mothersbaugh reveal their frustrations with the powers that be, and joyful when we see footage of the band doing what they do best — exercising their ample talents to subversively criticize the dysfunctional system that they slyly ascended and innovated within, if only for a few years.

• •

Dahomey

dir. Mati Diop / France, Senegal, Benin

Five years have passed since the premiere of French-Senegalese director Mati Diop’s critically lauded feature debut, Atlantique. Set in the capital city of Dakar, Diop’s first full-length fiction work, is a gripping and mystical drama where Diop expertly melded the film’s environment with the characters’ responses to desperate situations to create an absorbing contemporary portrait of a place and its people. For her latest feature, Dahomey, Diop again combines elements of environment and a fictional engine, but here she also joins them with a key moment in history to present a slender yet affecting hybrid documentary that fosters critical dialogues around France’s 2021 repatriation of 26 stolen relics (from a total of over 7,000 looted) to the Republic of Benin, the former Kingdom of Dahomey. Diop presents this repatriation of stolen items in three fluid parts. The first section introduces us to the 26 artifacts still housed in the Musée du Quai Branly followed by their transportation from Paris to Cotonou. In the film’s second section, we witness students from the University of Abomey-Calavi engage in a fierce and impassioned debate about the significance of the return of their cultural possessions; and in the final third, the statues and other artifacts are displayed for the first time in a Beninese museum. When outlined, Dahomey’s overall narrative structure may sound like the makings of a standard documentary, but Diop’s imaginative choice to anthropomorphize the 26th item returned, the figure of King Ghézo, who ruled the Kingdom of Dahomey from 1797 to 1818, boldly distinguishes her work. As the film’s central narrator, King Ghézo speaks in the Dahomean language of Fon, articulating his thoughts on being trapped in the darkness of his shipping crate and his ruminations on his own existence and history. Resoundingly rendered so that Ghézo’s voice sounds like a soul communicating from centuries long ago, Diop’s technique brings emotionality to Ghézo’s symbolic plight as a representative of the items being returned to Benin, while also elevating the difficult eternal debate around the ethics and impact of any attempt by colonial governments to repatriate plundered culturally significant items, an act that serves as only a banal gesture towards the citizens of the victimized country who long for their remaining stolen artifacts and resources that will most likely never be returned.

• •

Christmas Eve in Miller’s Point

dir. Tyler Taormina / USA

One must always remember that the word “nostalgia” is a learned formation of a Greek compound consisting of nóstos, meaning “homecoming,” and álgos, meaning “pain.” Keeping that in mind, possibly no song provokes greater “nostalgia” within us than the Goffin-King-penned track, “Point of No Return,” a top 40 hit for Gene McDaniels back in 1962. To digress for a moment…When we first moved to Knoxville in 2018, the sole oldies station in town was clearly engaged in an all-out blitzkrieg to revive this McDaniels’ cut, which, if you’ve never heard it before, is rife with over-annunciation, stark dramatic pauses, and a lavish orchestration that feels more akin to a John Barry score or a Tom Jones performance for Ed Sullivan than the soulful arrangement the song’s heartbreaking lyrics warranted. For about a year or so, we would giggle whenever “Point of No Return” blasted through our kitchen, but all that changed after months of being trapped inside during COVID. The McDaniels song took on an entirely different meaning, circumventing any semblance of kitsch and veering towards something closer to political reeducation announcements. Since his impressive debut feature, Ham on Rye, director Tyler Taormina has harnessed the fiendish power that nostalgia has over us by selectively introducing us to warm and fuzzy sounds and images from multiple eras via film language whilst loudly injecting an underlying tone that suggests the layers of brokenness we mindlessly gloss over while engaging in pointless, familiar ritual. So, with Taormina’s ethos firmly established, we readied ourselves for a viewing of the director’s latest, knowing full well that there is no greater Holy Grail of nostalgia than that of the holiday film. Christmas Eve in Miller’s Point is a faded and ragu-smeared Yuletide snapshot gathering of the obtusely Long Island blue-collar Italian-American family, the Bolsanos, whom we observe as they merrily and not-so-merrily bask in the clichés of the season. Food cooks, gifts are exchanged, teens sneak out to be with their friends, and the grownups argue about putting Mom into a home while sonically lurking by the boughs of holly and bowls of green and red M&Ms is “Point of No Return,” one of the many ironic non-holiday torch songs from yesteryear that gets a bonus play or two on the soundtrack for that extra taste of a past becoming further obsolete. Sharply edited into a frenzy so that no thread is followed beyond a moment or two of tension-filled dialog, leaving zero chance for the development of any dramatic event that would distinguish this celebration from the myriad of other Christmas Eves in the Bolsano home, even though traces of impending change creep throughout, Taormina’s film works like that final obligatory school Christmas pageant, an extravagant display of holiday tropes that are overshadowed by individual interests and concerns unrelated to the event, with its paraphernalia and associated warmth soon destined, just like the oldies of the soundtrack, for dusty boxes in storage once and for all.

• •

Karlovy Vary (Second Chance)

dir. Subhadra Mahajan / India

It is almost impossible to believe that only a few generations ago a sense of community in an urban landscape was alive and well. Before the 2000s and the rapid repopulation of cities by people of substantial means, communities were kept alive by the residents who carried innate knowledge of their neighborhood, creating an environment that, despite its mammoth size, was able to foster a sense of belonging by its people who were imbibed by a firm sense of that place and its capabilities to foster its own world. For Nia (Dheera Johnson), an emotionally distraught upper-class young woman, an exodus from Delhi becomes critical for her well-being following the abandonment by her boyfriend due to her unwanted pregnancy. Physically and psychologically fragile after ingesting abortion pills, Nia, with a nervously clutched cellphone in hand, arrives at her family’s summer home high up in the Pir Panjal mountain range to recuperate. It’s a place that Nia has come to know well since her youth, and with the winter descending on the region, she is promised a quiet space to convalesce with only the caretaker Raju (Rajesh Kumar) and his small family on the property. But, shortly after Nia arrives, Raju is called away, and Nia is left with Raju’s elderly mother-in-law, Bhemi (Thakra Devi), and his wildly boisterous yet disarmingly sweet son, Sunny (Kanav Thakur), both of whom offer assistance to Nia whichever way they can. However, omnipresent throughout the growing relationship between Nia, Bhemi, and Sunny is a question of class prerogative, and director Mahajan adeptly implies the socioeconomic distance between the three with the small moments that occur between them, whether it be Nia’s joy in soundly beating Sunny in a casual game of cricket or Nia’s refusal to eat the food that Bhemi skillfully crafts for her. The divide is never overtly stated, but it generates a tension early on that drives the narrative while also giving insight into Nia’s inability to feel comfortable in her own skin, whether she is in Delhi or seemingly light years away in nature. As the days go by and Nia is thrust into distressing situations that require serious assistance, she begins to accept the emotional and physical help that she gets from her surrogate family and starts to recognize their extraordinary symbiosis with the land, which gives Nia the strength to solemnly examine her own situation. Aided by the superb black and white camerawork by Swapnil Suhas Sonawane that captures not only the beauty, but also the harsh isolation of the film’s setting, Mahajan’s impressive feature debut goes far beyond the cliché of the urbanite who finds themself by succumbing to the mystical wiles of nature: Second Chance is a somber, yet occasionally funny, and ultimately complex character study that speaks volumes about the ever-growing chasm between the societally mandated expectations we thoughtlessly place on ourselves and the power of place and the people connected to it who help us reestablish our natural sense of self.

• •

Gou Zhen (Black Dog)

dir. Guan Hu / China

Set in the months before the 2008 Beijing Olympics in a small town on the outskirts of the Gobi desert, Guan Hu’s, Black Dog, the winner of Un Certain Regard at this year’s Cannes, is, at its core, a man and his dog story elevated to a sprawling, sometimes allegory-overwrought, but absorbing political drama. Returning to his slowly withering hometown to spend time with his dying father is our near-silent anti-hero, Lang (Eddie Peng), a musician of some notoriety, stunt motorcyclist, and ex-con who just ended his ten year prison sentence after being convicted of manslaughter for the accidental death of his riding partner, a crime that many of the locals still hold over Lang’s head. Left with few friends in town and even slimmer prospects for work, Lang joins the local governmental effort to round up the exceedingly large number of wild dogs deemed undesirable by the town, with the infamous titular canine, a rumored carrier of rabies, singled out as the coveted prize given the sizable reward for its capture. Although Lang, slightly mauled by the hunted emaciated dog early in the film, makes the decision to keep the cur once his job dictates that he captures the animal, this act of defiance unites these outcasts, who along with the packs of stray dogs, serve as a symbol against Beijing’s plan for sweeping change in this arid region that would require the elimination of any roadblocks and eyesores standing in the way of progress. Alternating between comedy, sentimentality, and social commentary mixed with healthy doses of magical realism, Guan Hu’s film is affecting for a good portion of its 149 minute running time, especially in the quieter moments when it concentrates on the relationship between Lang and his newfound four-legged friend, but the narrative stumbles a bit when it expands its scope to include too many subplots, such as the underdeveloped romance between Lang and a traveling circus performer named Grape. But, despite its desire for an unnecessarily epic scale and a nagging sense that some intended messaging may have been censored, Black Dog is a well-acted and poignant take on an ever-evolving China that may be changing too quickly without any regard for its own people.

• •

All films were screened at AFI Fest 2024. Many thanks and congratulations to the staff and volunteers of AFI Fest for another excellent year of cinema and conversations, and a special thanks to Johanna Calderón-Dakin, Senior Publicity Associate for AFI Fest, who made our coverage possible.

Featured photo courtesy of AFI Fest.

AFI Fest

LAST SUMMER

Standard

Originally published on Ink 19 on August 16, 2024

Last Summer
directed by Catherine Breillat

It has been a decade since novelist and auteur filmmaker Catherine Breillat presented her last feature, Abus de faiblesse (Abuse of Weakness), a harrowing, semi-autobiographical film based on her own 2009 book that delved into her real-life victimization by a notorious conman decades her junior. As had been the case for the predominance of Breillat’s oeuvre with works like 36 Fillette and RomanceAbuse of Weakness deftly and viscerally confronted our notions of intimacy and sexuality in a way that few filmmakers are able to achieve by forcing one into the uneasy skin of its protagonist.

Surprisingly, for her latest feature, L’été dernier (Last Summer), Breillat decided to reimagine the critically acclaimed 2019 film Dronningen (Queen of Hearts) by May el-Toukhy, in which a lawyer, who specializes in representing young women who have experienced sexual abuse, turns into the abuser of her own teenage stepson.

We’ve long admired Breillat’s distinct style as a filmmaker, often drawing from her own writings and novels, so learning ahead of the film’s release that she was trying to remake another feature — especially one this recent — was fascinating. Given the themes present in the predominance of her filmography and her recent experiences, it made sense why Breillat would be drawn to this particular story, but on description alone it was unclear how her idiosyncratic style would alter the narrative.

However, in the first minutes when we see the veteran actress Léa Drucker embodying the role of Anne in Breillat’s adaptation and hear the compact and effortlessly constructed and delivered dialog, Breillat’s signature approach firmly announces its arrival. In this initial scene, Anne is meticulously preparing a young female client for the virulent questioning from defense attorneys that will most likely occur during an upcoming trial. Anne is confident and raw in her approach, but we also see her as someone who possesses elements of tempered compassion: she’s severe because she wants her client to be prepared for the questions that will aim to discredit her testimony, but she also reassures her client that she believes in her. When the scene eventually shifts to Anne’s idyllic country home, we meet her husband, Pierre (Olivier Rabourdin), a beleaguered financier who tells Anne that Théo (Samuel Kircher), his teenage son from a previous marriage, has gotten into trouble that is beyond his mother’s capabilities to handle and must move in with them for an undetermined amount of time. This potentially upsetting addition to their blissful family dynamic, which already includes two adolescent adopted Asian daughters, is agreed upon with no argument from the loving couple.

Once Théo arrives at Anne and Pierre’s home, he gives off the classic appearance of a rebellious and mildly cosmopolitan teen who has been exiled to the sticks as a form of punishment, but as he settles in, his behavior vacillates between bratty (almost on the verge of malevolent) and gleeful. He throws verbal barbs at his father that most of us would shudder to think of, and yet he readily accepts the role of a doting older brother to his stepsisters, whom he adores almost instantaneously. Anne’s first reaction to Théo’s jibes thrusts her into an authoritarian figure, but after Anne agrees to never speak of an aggravated transgression from Théo and brokers a deal with him to protect the stability and cohesiveness of the family, the separation between the stepmother and stepson dissipates into an unspoken connection. And, the once stern talks give way into cigarette sharing hangs behind the house and Anne riding pillion on Théo’s scooter though the countryside to a local bar, where the two speak openly with a camaraderie likened to that of close friends.

Inevitably, when the ever-growing sexual tension between the two materializes into a physical act, Breillat tightens her focus on the level of warmth, comfort, and intimacy between them, suggesting that their bond comes from more of an empathetic place than simply a carnal one, which is a key point of departure for Breillat’s rendering from the original Queen of Hearts, where Anne’s attraction to her stepson stems from a simplistic need to feel younger. Initially, Breillat lets the carefree moments between Anne and Théo happen from a safe distance that never feels contrived, and although it’s unsettling to watch, every second between the pair says volumes about Anne’s current mental state while naturally alluding to the very personal reasons why she decided to become a lawyer for abuse victims. Astonishingly, through the careful execution of the verbal and physical interactions between Anne and Théo, we even come to see Anne as a victim herself, but when the potential exposure of their illegal tryst becomes eminent and Anne breaks off her relationship with Théo much to his discontent, we see Anne radically shift from victim back into an attorney who knows the language of abuse and can use it to her advantage in silencing her stepson’s allegations.

Besides the drastic change in outcomes between the two films, a difference which may heavily suggest why Breillat chose to make this adaptation, the key to Breillat’s affecting interpretation of Queen of Hearts is the director’s decision to remove all elements of melodrama that were hard-wired into May el-Toukhy’s film. Breillat’s choice softens the obvious points of contention in the film related to the morality of Anne’s actions, which orients Last Summer far away from a sensationalistic, manufactured drama and towards its in-depth and compelling analysis of Anne as a mother, wife, woman, and foibled human. We (and Anne herself) absolutely know that she should not have a romantic relationship with Théo, but Breillat doesn’t expend energy on trying to rile up judgment from the audience towards Anne to encourage an air of superiority. Instead, the director guides us through Anne’s actions, motivations, and responses, all of which become understandable, albeit uncomfortably so.

Ultimately, Last Summer sets itself apart from Queen of Hearts with a tone more akin to Agnès Varda’s 1988 film Kung-Fu Master!, another subdued and nuanced film about the illicit relationship between an older woman and an underaged boy. Breillat artfully infuses her long-cultivated sensibilities into every aspect of Last Summer in a knowing way that tempers the overtly audacious delivery that was more present in her earlier films while still continuing to question and challenge our assumptions about how factors such as class, power, attractiveness, and trauma can control and distort women’s desires as well as the subjects of their desire. Both Varda’s and Breillat’s pieces benefited from the skillful artistic vision of seasoned filmmakers who fearlessly examined the complexity of flawed women who, despite their outward appearances of stability, have psyches and pasts that betray their best intentions.

Featured photo courtesy of Janus Films and Sideshow.

Last Summer

Lily and Generoso Fierro

Matías Meyer

Standard

Originally published on Ink19 on July 14, 2016

Interview conducted by Lily and Generoso Fierro

On June 17th and 18th, the UCLA Film & Television Archive presented the first complete retrospective on the work of emerging independent Mexican filmmaker Matías Meyer. The retrospective collected the short films across Meyer’s career, including his first films made as a student at Centro de Capacitación Cinematográfica, and his four feature films, with his most recent film, Yo, receiving its US premiere on the opening night of the series.

In all of Meyer’s films, voyages frame the narratives for both the characters and the viewers, and in each voyage, the environment and the characters have a tacit yet well-understood relationship with each other, moving in a fluid call-and-response way to the presence of one another. As a result, the environment is as much, if not more, of a character than the people in Meyer’s films. With the exception of his most recent short, which was filmed in Meyer’s current half-home of Quebec, Le champ des possibles (“The Field of Possible”), the director’s focus is committed to the ever-changing environment of Mexico, whether looking at its past, as seen in his documentary, Moros y Cristianos (“Moors and Christians”), about the largest open-air group presentation in all of Latin America, a re-enactment of the 16th century Battle of Lepanto, and his most ambitious narrative feature, Los Últimos Cristeros (“The Last Cristeros”), set during Zapata-era Mexico, or its present day, with films like Wadley, an experimental view into one man’s journey through the wild Mexican landscape, and Yo, which, based on our conversation with Matías during the series, is his most personal film to date.

Yo refers to the title character (played by Raúl Silva Gómez), a large man in his early twenties who we soon realize is functional, yet developmentally challenged, and as thus, he remains in a state of perpetual adolescence. Yo is under the care of his mother (Elizabeth Mendoza), and they both live and work at the family restaurant where Yo has the unenviable task of slaughtering and plucking the chickens that they serve. Also residing with Yo is his mother’s lover Pady (Ignacio Rojas Nieto), a brutish man in his fifties who has a tendency towards being abusive towards Yo, which seems to have become so commonplace that no one in the house raises any concern, including Yo, who seems content with his menial tasks and chances to play with his coins on the floor of the restaurant and goes unnoticed to the patrons as though he is a piece of furniture, a trivial part of the restaurant setting. This is the first moment that one notices humans’ interactions with their surroundings, a key element in most of Meyer’s previous work.

Furthering this motif of man’s reaction to his environment, man-made or natural, are the moments when Yo, who takes great joy in watching the giant tractor-trailer trucks that tear through his normally serene Mexican village, becomes plagued by nightmares of the local river dangerously overflowing, which wakes Yo from his sleep and forces his mother to reassure him by taking him to the still, placid river in the middle of the night. Even though Yo’s mother turns a blind eye to the abuses in the home by championing her lover over her son, she is still overprotective of Yo when it comes to how he might function outside of her grasp.

With business in the restaurant improving, Yo’s mother hires a woman to help her out who must also bring her eleven-year-old daughter, Elena (Isis Vanesa Cortés), to the restaurant everyday. Elena and Yo immediately become friends, but with this newfound friendship comes a layer of tension for the viewer as Yo, who has had limited interactions with women, may not have the emotional maturity to control his sexual impulses. Yo and Elena take frequent trips to the nearby river together and play with one another in a flirtatious way, but Elena, who seems beyond her years in maturity, deflects any casual advances from Yo. Though Yo is twenty-two, these moments with Elena are most likely his first foray into society without the guarded eye of his mother there to establish order. No one has gotten hurt, but soon Yo will be forced to face the outside world head-on when Pady purchases a machine that can handle Yo’s singular chore of killing and plucking the chickens for the restaurant. Pady then calls in friends to get Yo work hauling rubble at a local construction site, so Yo can begin the process of becoming an adult away from his mother’s daily reach.

Matías Meyer

Once on the construction site, Yo does hard physical labor and is up to the task, much to the delight of his co-workers and his supervisor. Yo even makes friends at his new job, friends who expose Yo even further to mainstream society as they introduce Yo to the vices of alcohol and prostitution. Whether Yo’s newfound friends are laughing with him or at him, they welcome him as part of their group and take him to nightspots where Yo again blends into his surroundings without appearing too out of place, but just like the river that Yo imagines overflowing, how long will his inner peace remain intact given the ever changing environment around him?

As opposed to Meyer’s previous feature, the Zapata-era film, Los Últimos CristerosYo is a fairly modest production that involves a small amount of actors, the usual use of the set, one-camera shot for most scenes, and a few locations, but like his previous feature, it utilizes the spacious natural terrain of Mexico to cleverly further the development of the film’s central characters. The tension that Meyer creates with his character of Yo and his disenfranchisement with his surroundings is palpable throughout the film in the same eerily quiet and ominous way that Iranian director Jafar Panahi presents in his equally marginalized central character of Hussein, the beleaguered and impoverished pizza delivery man who wanders through a unwelcoming Tehran, in his 2003 film, Crimson Gold. As in Crimson Gold, an excellently crafted level of tension is what drives the narrative even during the most tranquil of scenes, which provided the main reason why we were so completely engaged with the film.

Impressed by Meyer’s achievement in his fourth feature, my wife Lily and I were fortunate enough to sit down with the young director to discuss his work the day after attending the screening of Yo at UCLA.

Director Matías Meyer speaks with Lily Fierro at the UCLA's Hammer Museum
PHOTO BY GENEROSO FIERRODirector Matías Meyer speaks with Lily Fierro at the UCLA’s Hammer Museum

• •

Lily Fierro : Last night, during the premiere of Yo, you spoke about the invisibility of Mexican cinema. In your answer, you had mentioned that some of your fellow directors believe that making films more specific to what audiences want, is a solution to this issue. You said that this would not be your own approach. In what way do you think that Mexican filmmakers can make films that capture Mexico’s landscape, culture, and tradition without concern that foreign audiences may feel alienated?

Matías Meyer : The thing is in Mexico City, recently, there was the Mexican “Oscars,” called The Ariel Awards, and we went to the ceremony and saw the famed director Paul Leduc, who was receiving a Golden Ariel for his career, make a speech for fifteen minutes that focused on the invisibility of Mexican cinema. The government is very proud to say that they have produced one hundred and fifty films a year, and he responded by saying that yes, but no one ever sees them. He then said something that really registered for me, and that was, “Mexicans do not really want to be Mexican. Culturally, they are more into the American cultural empire.”

I myself, grew up in a small town in Mexico, and for most young people, it was about wearing Nikes to be more like Michael Jordan or about American football and Deion Sanders, so it was more about this part of American culture. So, you have this American dream, about how cool it is to live in the United States, and for entertainment and films, you have the Rambos and the Commandos that you watched on television, but on the other side, you have the telenovelas, that are all about drama and class struggles. Mexicans are always watching television; even when you see a taco vendor in the street, they will have a small television, and if they are not watching sports, they are watching the telenovelas. So, the public has not been created for accepting other kinds of movies, which leads me to think that the problem is that the public has not been properly informed. I think that the bigger problem in Mexico is about education. Now, there is a large movement of teachers pushing for educational reform, but the roadblocks are the syndicates and the political power of syndicates, so the whole thing ends up being not about learning and educating. I don’t know how we can fight against this problem; we can try to find a goal via entertainment, but I don’t believe that we can succeed.

I am working on a new film that I hope is less niche than the films that I have done to this point in the hopes of having a wide appeal, but I am not sure if I can achieve this. In the long term, perhaps showing more Mexican films on television is the solution, so Mexican culture, instead of American culture, becomes the norm on the most popular medium for people of Mexico.

Generoso Fierro : Given that Mexicans prefer television as their main source of ingesting media, does a place exist where arthouse cinema is still shown on a large screen?

Matías Meyer : There is in Mexico City, in Coyoacán, which is the area where Frida Kahlo used to live, a cinematheque that has existed for thirty or forty years that has just been remodeled. It used to have six screening rooms, and now, it has twelve. It is a beautiful place where you can have coffee, and there are even outdoor screenings that are free for the public. The theater gets about a million patrons a year, and if your film is there, it will definitely have an audience. I have just released Yo in Mexico City and six other cities, and to this point, five thousand people have seen the film, and the cinematheque represents forty-five percent of that total viewership. As far as the other theaters that have shown it, they have pulled it after one week, so films like this shouldn’t be at a multiplex; they should be screened at arthouse cinemas, so we really need more of them. Mexico City has twenty five million people but only one arthouse theater, so the need is there for more cinematheques in not only Mexico City but in the other cities and villages as well.

Lily Fierro : Could you speak about the origins of Yo?

Matías Meyer : Yo was made right after Los Últimos Cristeros (2012), which is the biggest film I have made until now. That film is a western that is set in the 1930s during the revolution, which was a labor-intensive process, so after its completion, I was looking for a different kind of project. One day, my mother gave me this book by Jean-Marie Le Clézio, and she told me that it was a collection of short stories and that there was one story that she felt that I might like, and she was correct. Even though I liked all of the stories, there was indeed one story that I wanted to adapt and see onscreen and that was the story called “Yo”. Also, these days, whenever I think of a film, I immediately take into account the production concerns, which ultimately makes me ask myself the question: Am I going be able to make this film? Most of the story takes place in the restaurant and only involves a few characters, so the production would not be too complicated, and as Jean-Marie Le Clézio was a friend of my family, since he met my father while they were in their early twenties, he graciously gave me the rights to make the film. As “Yo” impacted me so heavily, the next day I contacted a screenwriter friend of mine in Canada and told him that this story would make a good film and that I would send it to him immediately. He read it soon afterwards and agreed that it would make an excellent film.

In a personal way, I wanted to make the film as I have a nephew who reminds me of Yo, as they have similar developmental issues, and my nephew was at the same point in his life where he was becoming an adult and was beginning to have a sexual attraction to other people. For my nephew and Yo, dealing with sexuality becomes so socially awkward because even if they have been presented with normal societal examples of how to deal with their feelings, they still have issues with their expressions of sexual desire. Besides the connection to my nephew, I also wanted to make a more narrative film as Los Últimos Cristeros is more about wandering and experiences, and with “Yo” I thought there was the potential for more traditional narrative structure and the opportunity to convey the anxiety that comes through in the story. There is a feeling of suspense that manifests due to unpredictable nature of Yo’s character that I also found interesting.

Matías Meyer

Generoso Fierro : Does the short story by Jean-Marie Le Clézio occur in France? What was the process of adapting an originally French story for Mexico?

Matías Meyer : I felt that the story was very universal. It is about this boy living with his mother on the side of the highway and his relationship with the little girl and the workers whom he comes to be with, so the film could’ve been shot anywhere. I knew that funding would’ve been easier in Mexico as opposed to where I live now in Canada, but I did write the script in French and translated it to Spanish because the co-writer is French-Canadian.

Lily Fierro : We were able to see two of your films yesterday evening that focused on sojourns into nature. The lead character in your first feature film, Wadley, exists entirely in nature as he escapes the city for the desert, and in your newest film, Yo, the titular character uses the the nearby river as a place to re-center himself, for it is a place of purity. But, does the river also represent the source of Yo’s essence of being, where he is more of an embodiment of nature than others?

Matías Meyer : I think that is a good interpretation. I like to leave my films open to personal interpretation to allow the viewer to be more interactive and less passive with what is onscreen. There is the scene in Yo when the mother takes the girl Elena and says, “Where were you? I was very worried, and I do not want you going to that place again,” and Yo goes to the waterfalls, and there is the moonlight, and I don’t know why, but this scene reminds me of Percival from Le Morte d’Arthur. I had this memory from when I was a child of watching this film on television where Percival is showered with the blood of a dragon that he has slain and that blood will make him immortal. So, I don’t know why, but I felt that this scene always made me believe that nature is a mystical place.

Generoso FIerro : There is a level of mechanization that increases in Yo as he is haphazardly forced onto a journey to manhood. The chicken barrel displaces his role as a chicken plucker in his mom’s restaurant, and on the construction site, trucks and cranes appear and carry far more than any human can, foreshadowing the eventual mechanization of his job hauling construction excess. Simultaneously, Yo is encountering more men in his life, and they place him in precarious situations involving alcohol and sexuality. How were you thinking about balancing conflicts between the pure essence of male human nature and evolving environment?

Matías Meyer : In a certain way, I think that it is good that Pady, the man who is the lover of Yo’s mother, is a bit forceful with Yo because mothers can be a bit too protective of their children. So, I like that Pady pushes Yo, which forces will him evolve and to find his own place in society. In his mother’s house, Yo is never going to succeed, and I think that is part of the problem when you have a disabled child: that you, as a parent, become too frightened for them if they go out into the world.

Generoso Fierro : I think that you exemplify that point visually about halfway through in the film. There is a great shot where Yo is playing on the floor of his mother’s restaurant when Pady brings in the construction workers who Yo will eventually work for as Yo’s role in the restaurant has changed now that a machine has been brought in to pluck the chickens.

Matías Meyer : Yes, there is a position in nature, and there is also a place for human constructed spaces like the beautiful land near the restaurant that is violated by the highway with its cars and loud noise. There is this element of man against nature that I wanted to show: how the world that man has created is so noisy, which conflicts with nature, and how by immersing yourself in a natural setting we can find a more original state where we can live harmoniously.

Lily Fierro : Given your fascination with Mexico’s culture and your desire to depict it on screen, we have to address the non-secular elements of Yo. Specifically, Yo’s Madonna-Whore complex that plays out between the four main women of the film: his mother, Elena, Jenny, Luisa. You avoid idolatry in all of the settings, but elements of Catholicism are subtly portrayed through Elena’s parochial school uniform and in the music you use, especially in the club scene where a disco version of “Ave Maria” plays in the background. Do you see organized faith (or its integration into society) as being as much in conflict with the natural environment as rapid mechanization?

Matías Meyer : That disco version of “Ave Maria” is in the book, actually. There are some people who say that Roman Catholicism is a lie because the day that Christ is born is actually the shortest day of the year, so by doing that, they are associating astronomy with religion. And I respond with, “Well yes, but is that is the opposite of religion?” I personally don’t think so as Christ is the son of God, and you can see this with the use of icons, which only help us to identify more with faith. It is just a very intelligent construction of symbolism. So, I would never say that faith or religion is bad; it is what we make of it, the same as science, which you should never say is a bad thing. I come from a religious family, but I never went to church. In terms of faith, my father would read the Bible to us on Sunday night before we went to sleep, and for me this was perfect, and that is why I don’t have any issues with Catholicism because I was never forced to go to church, which I think is a terrible way to introduce faith to a child. It is better for your children to discover God in their own way.

Matías Meyer

• •

We would live to give special thanks to Matías Meyer for his time and for his generous responses during our interview with him, and to Shannon Kelley, the Head of Public Programs, UCLA Film & Television Archive, who made this series possible.

Official Trailer: https://vimeo.com/151978177